Cited by 302Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCoronary Artery Anomalies

Three-dimensional black-blood cardiac magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging detects positive arterial remodeling in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease

Kim, W. Yong, Stuber, Matthias, Börnert, Peter, Kissinger, Kraig V., Manning, Warren J., Botnar, René M.·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background — Direct noninvasive visualization of the coronary vessel wall may enhance risk stratification by quantifying subclinical coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden. We sought to evaluate high-resolution black-blood 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for in vivo visualization of the proximal coronary artery vessel wall. Methods and Results — Twelve adult subjects, including 6 clinically healthy subjects and 6 patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (10% to 50% x-ray angiographic diameter reduction) were studied with the use of a commercial 1.5 Tesla CMR scanner. Free-breathing 3D coronary vessel wall imaging was performed along the major axis of the right coronary artery with isotropic spatial resolution (1.0×1.0×1.0 mm 3 ) with the use of a black-blood spiral image acquisition. The proximal vessel wall thickness and luminal diameter were objectively determined with an automated edge detection tool. The 3D CMR vessel wall scans allowed for visualization of the contiguous proximal right coronary artery in all subjects. Both mean vessel wall thickness (1.7±0.3 versus 1.0±0.2 mm) and wall area (25.4±6.9 versus 11.5±5.2 mm 2 ) were significantly increased in the patients compared with the healthy subjects (both P <0.01). The lumen diameter (3.6±0.7 versus 3.4±0.5 mm, P =0.47) and lumen area (8.9±3.4 versus 7.9±3.5 mm 2 , P =0.47) were similar in both groups. Conclusions — Free-breathing 3D black-blood coronary CMR with isotropic resolution identified an increased coronary vessel wall thickness with preservation of lumen size in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease, consistent with a “Glagov-type” outward arterial remodeling. This novel approach has the potential to quantify subclinical disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000025629.85631.1e

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Botnar RM, Stuber M, Danias PG, et al. A fast 3D approach for coronary MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:821-825.
  2. Schaer M, Kim WY, Stuber M, et al. The impact of spatial resolution and respiratory motion on magnetic resonance plaque characterization. J Car- diovasc Magn Res. 2002;4:73-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, W. Y., Stuber, M., Börnert, P., Kissinger, K. V., Manning, W. J., & Botnar, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • From the Department of Medicine (W.Y.K., M.S., W.J.M, R.M.B.), Cardiovascular Division, and the Department of Radiology (W.J.M.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; The MR-Center, Department of Cardiology (W.Y.K.) and Institute of Experimental Clinical Research, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus, Denmark; Philips Medical Systems (M.S., R.M.B.), Best, the Netherlands; and Philips Research Laboratories (P.B.), Hamburg, Germany.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-07-16
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
296-299
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2156244896
Cited by
302
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
Keywords
coronary artery remodeling, vessel wall thickness, lumen diameter, subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, risk stratification, right coronary artery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Coronary Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review