Blood Pressure Response to Caffeine Shows Incomplete Tolerance After Short-Term Regular Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Caffeine acutely raises blood pressure (BP). The clinical significance of this effect depends on whether BP responses persist in persons who consume caffeine on a daily basis. Accordingly, the ability of caffeine to raise BP after 5 days of regular daily intake was tested in a randomized controlled trial. Individual differences in tolerance formation were then examined. Men (n=49) and women (n=48) completed a double-blind, crossover trial conducted over 4 weeks. During each week, subjects abstained for 5 days from dietary caffeine and instead used capsules totaling 0 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg of caffeine per day in 3 divided doses. On day 6, in the laboratory, they used capsules with either 0 mg or 250 mg of caffeine at 9:00 am and 1:00 pm . Systolic/diastolic BP increases as a result of 250 mg of caffeine remained significant ( P <0.006/0.001) at all levels of previous daily consumption. Individual difference comparisons found that although half the subjects had complete loss of systolic and diastolic BP responses to the challenge doses, the other half showed no loss in BP response, even after using 600 mg of caffeine per day for the previous 5 days ( F >7.90, P <0.001). The sexes did not differ in degree of tolerance formation. Daily caffeine consumption failed to eliminate the BP response to repeated challenge doses of caffeine in half of the healthy adults who were tested. Caffeine may therefore cause persistent BP effects in persons who are regular consumers, even when daily intake is at moderately high levels.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caffeine improves exercise performance through its distribution to the central nervous system and peripheral tissues and its blockade of central and peripheral adenosine receptors.
“Caffeine’s ergogenic effects are due to its widespread distribution following ingestion into the central nervous system and peripheral tissues and its subsequent antagonism of central and peripheral adenosine receptors [9, 10].”
From Habitual preexercise caffeine supplementation prevents exercise training-induced attenuation of exercising systolic blood pressure and double product (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The opening background passage (indexed under Abstract; page not provided) says caffeine reaches tissues throughout the body and acts through adenosine receptors in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. It does not link those actions to improved exercise performance. The exercise-related item in the References concerns blood pressure during exercise, not an ergogenic effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSome studies have shown that habitual consumption results in tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode and that tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.
“Some studies have shown that habitual consumption results in a tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, 18,19 while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode 20,21 and that the tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.22”
From Coffee and acute ischemic stroke onset: The Stroke Onset Study (2010) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 105
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [5]5. Wood HC. The effects of caffeine on the circulatory and muscular systems. Therapeutic Gazette. 1912;36:6 -12.
- Authors
- Lovallo, W. R., Wilson, M. F., Vincent, A. S., Sung, B. H., McKey, B. S., & Whitsett, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Kaleida Health (US)
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 760-765
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W1993065143
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-32050-S2, HL32050, HL07640, T32HL007640, R01HL032050)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- caffeine, blood pressure, caffeine tolerance, individual differences, sex differences, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Tolerance, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Saliva, Vascular Resistance, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review