Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

Open access
Verdecchia, Paolo, Reboldi, Gianpaolo, Angeli, Fabio, Gattobigio, Roberto, Bentivoglio, Maurizio, Thijs, Lutgarde, Staessen, Jan A., Porcellati, Carlo·2005·Hypertension

Abstract

We investigated whether protection from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke conferred by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive or high-risk patients may be explained by the specific drug regimen. We extracted summary statistics regarding CHD and stroke from 28 outcome trials that compared either ACEIs or CCBs with diuretics, β-blockers, or placebo for a total of 179 122 patients, 9509 incident cases of CHD, and 5971 cases of stroke. CHD included myocardial infarction and coronary death. In placebo-controlled trials, ACEIs decreased the risk of CHD ( P <0.001), and CCBs reduced stroke incidence ( P <0.001). There were no significant differences in CHD risk between regimens based on diuretics/β-blockers and regimens based on ACEIs ( P =0.46) or CCBs ( P =0.52). The risk of stroke was reduced by CCBs ( P =0.041) but not by ACEIs ( P =0.15) compared with diuretics/β-blockers. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by metaregression. Examined covariates were the reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP), drug treatment (ACEIs versus CCBs), their interaction term, sex, age at randomization, year of publication, and duration of treatment. Prevention of CHD was explained by systolic BP reduction ( P <0.001) and use of ACEIs ( P =0.028), whereas prevention of stroke was explained by systolic BP reduction ( P =0.001) and use of CCBs ( P =0.042). These findings confirm that BP lowering is fundamental for prevention of CHD and stroke. However, over and beyond BP reduction, ACEIs appear superior to CCBs for prevention of CHD, whereas CCBs appear superior to ACEIs for prevention of stroke.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000174591.42889.a2

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Verdecchia, P., Reboldi, G., Angeli, F., Gattobigio, R., Bentivoglio, M., Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., & Porcellati, C.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2005-08
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
386-392
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2108486578
Cited by
338
References
12
FWCI
28.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.0000174591.42889.a2
The paper
Verdecchia, P., Reboldi, G., Angeli, F., Gattobigio, R., Bentivoglio, M., Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., & Porcellati, C. (2005). Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000174591.42889.a2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.