CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 527Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationMedication Adherence and Compliance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapeutic Inertia Is an Impediment to Achieving the Healthy People 2010 Blood Pressure Control Goals

Open access
Okonofua, Eni C., Simpson, Kit N., Jesri, Ammar, Rehman, Shakaib U., Durkalski, Valerie L., Egan, Brent M.·2006·Hypertension
DOI 10.1161/01.hyp.0000200702.76436.4b
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Therapeutic inertia (TI), defined as the providers’ failure to increase therapy when treatment goals are unmet, contributes to the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg), but the quantitative impact is unknown. To address this gap, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on 7253 hypertensives that had ≥4 visits and ≥1 elevated blood pressure (BP) in 2003. A 1-year TI score was calculated for each patient as the difference between expected and observed medication change rates with higher scores reflecting greater TI. Antihypertensive therapy was increased on 13.1% of visits with uncontrolled BP. Systolic BP decreased in patients in the lowest quintile of the TI score but increased in those in the highest quintile (−6.8±0.5 versus +1.8±0.6 mm Hg; P <0.001). Individuals in the lowest TI quintile were &33 times more likely to have their BP controlled at the last visit than those in highest quintile (odds ratio, 32.7; 95% CI, 25.1 to 42.6; P <0.0001). By multivariable analysis, TI accounted for &19% of the variance in BP control. If TI scores were decreased &50%, that is, increasing medication dosages on &30% of visits, BP control would increase from the observed 45.1% to a projected 65.9% in 1 year. This study confirms the high rate of TI in uncontrolled hypertensive subjects. TI has a major impact on BP control in hypertensive subjects receiving regular care. Reducing TI is critical in attaining the Healthy People 2010 goal of controlling hypertension in 50% of all patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000200702.76436.4b

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1161/hyp.26.1.60 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/circ.95.4.1085 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 527

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Okonofua, E. C., Simpson, K. N., Jesri, A., Rehman, S. U., Durkalski, V. L., & Egan, B. M.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
ORCID
Venue
Hypertension
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2006-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
345-351
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
DOI
10.1161/01.hyp.0000200702.76436.4b
OpenAlex
W2157629272
Cited by
527
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
30.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P01 HS1087)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL04290, K24HL004290, R01HL058794, HL 58794)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD00267, P60MD000267, MD00267)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
therapeutic inertia, uncontrolled hypertension, blood pressure control, treatment goals, Healthy People 2010, primary care, systolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Diastole, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Goals, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Physician's Role, Quality of Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Systole, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review