The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vasodilation to acetylcholine in primary and secondary forms of human hypertension.
Abstract
Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation to acetylcholine is reduced in the forearm of essential hypertensive patients. To investigate whether endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is reduced also in secondary hypertension, we evaluated the effects of an intrabrachial infusion of acetylcholine on forearm blood flow (strain-gauge venous plethysmography) in essential hypertensive (n = 12), primary aldosteronism hypertensive (n = 8), and renovascular hypertensive (n = 8) patients and normotensive control subjects (n = 12). To further evaluate the role of a cyclooxygenase-dependent endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor substance, we repeated the infusion of acetylcholine in the presence of indomethacin. The effect of the direct vasodilator sodium nitroprusside was also examined. The vasodilatation to acetylcholine was reduced in essential, primary aldosteronism, and renovascular hypertensive patients compared with normotensive subjects. In contrast, the vasodilatation induced by sodium nitroprusside was similar in all groups of patients and control subjects. In the presence of indomethacin, the vasodilator effect of acetylcholine was increased in essential hypertensive patients but not in normotensive or in secondary hypertensive individuals. These data demonstrate an impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in renovascular and primary aldosteronism hypertensive patients and indicate that a cyclooxygenase-dependent vasoconstrictor mechanism participates in the blunting of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiological aspects of primary hypertension.
Folkow, B. (1982) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1982.62.2.347 · Cited by 1,768
Cited by
Prognostic Significance of Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients
Perticone, F., Ceravolo, R., Pujia, A., Ventura, G., Iacopino, S., Scozzafava, A., Ferraro, A., Chello, M., Mastroroberto, P., Verdecchia, P., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.104.2.191 · Cited by 1,059
Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture)
Félétou, M., & Vanhoutte, P. M. (2006) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00292.2006 · Cited by 818
Age-Related Reduction of NO Availability and Oxidative Stress in Humans
Taddei, S., Virdis, A., Ghiadoni, L., Salvetti, G., Bernini, G., Magagna, A., & Salvetti, A. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.38.2.274 · Cited by 664
Self-citationCardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism After Treatment
Catena, C. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2007.33 · Cited by 565
Emerging role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in cardiac and vascular protection.
Lonn, E. M., Yusuf, S., Jha, P., Montague, T. J., Teo, K. K., Benedict, C. R., & Pitt, B. (1994) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.90.4.2056 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Taddei, S., Virdis, A., Mattei, P., & Salvetti, A.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6_pt_2
- Pages
- 929-933
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W1973651651
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vasodilation to acetylcholine in primary and secondary forms of human hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.21.6.929
- The paper
- Taddei, S., Virdis, A., Mattei, P., & Salvetti, A. (1993). Vasodilation to acetylcholine in primary and secondary forms of human hypertension. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.21.6.929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.