Cited by 117Renin-Angiotensin System StudiesCardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress ResearchEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angiotensin II increases norepinephrine release from atria by acting on angiotensin subtype 1 receptors.

Brasch, H, Sieroslawski, L, Dominiak, P·1993·Hypertension

Abstract

Norepinephrine stores in electrically driven guinea pig isolated atria were loaded with [3H]norepinephrine, and norepinephrine release was deduced from the radioactivity efflux. Electrical field stimulation of sympathetic nerve endings was applied during the refractory period of atrial contractions. The stimulation-induced release of norepinephrine was increased by angiotensin II (Ang II) (10(-8) to 10(-6) mol/L) in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximum observed effect was a 55% augmentation. The effects of 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/L Ang II were abolished by 10(-6) and 10(-5) mol/L of the subtype 1 Ang II receptor antagonist losartan, respectively. Losartan by itself (10(-6) mol/L) caused a 14% reduction of norepinephrine release. The subtype 2 Ang II receptor ligand PD 123319 (1-[[4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]methyl]-5-(diphenylacetyl)- 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ditrifluoroacetate) in a concentration of 10(-4) mol/L had no detectable influence on transmitter release and did not antagonize the effect of Ang II. Angiotensin I (10(-6) and 10(-5) mol/L) increased norepinephrine release maximally by 23%. This effect was antagonized by 10(-5) mol/L losartan and did not appear in the presence of 10(-6) mol/L of the converting enzyme inhibitor ramiprilat. These results suggest that Ang II increases norepinephrine release by an activation of subtype 1 receptors, whereas angiotensin I is converted to Ang II to become effective.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.22.5.699

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brasch, H., Sieroslawski, L., & Dominiak, P.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1993-11
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
699-704
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2131304527
Cited by
117
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
angiotensin II, noradrenaline release, atrium, angiotensin II type 1 receptor, angiotensin I, losartan, PD123319, sympathetic activation, electrical field stimulation, ramiprilat, renin-angiotensin system
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Angiotensin I, Angiotensin II, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Animals, Biphenyl Compounds, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Guinea Pigs, Heart, Heart Atria, Imidazoles, Kinetics, Male, Myocardium, Norepinephrine, Receptors, Angiotensin, Tetrazoles, Ramipril, Losartan, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review