The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans.
Open accessAbstract
Whether the decrease in large-artery distensibility observed in hypertensive patients is due primarily to an increase in distending pressure or to hypertension-induced changes in structural properties has been much debated. We determined noninvasively the diameter-pressure curve of the common carotid artery over the systolic-diastolic range by continuously recording both the pulsatile changes in internal diameter (high-resolution echo-tracking system) and, simultaneously on the contralateral artery, the pressure waveform (high-fidelity applanation tonometry). We then derived the distensibility/pressure curve and compared arterial distensibility in 14 normotensive subjects and 15 age- and sex-matched hypertensive subjects at their respective mean arterial pressures (MAP) and at a common distending pressure: 100 mm Hg. Distensibility decreased as blood pressure increased, and distensibility at MAP was significantly lower in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects (7.8 +/- 0.7 versus 11.7 +/- 1.7 kPa-1.10(-3), mean +/- SEM; P < .05). In hypertensive subjects, the distensibility-pressure curve was shifted toward higher levels of blood pressure, and a large part of the curve overlapped that of normotensive subjects. No significant downward shift of the distensibility-pressure curve was observed in hypertensive subjects, and distensibility at 100 mm Hg was not significantly different from that of normotensive subjects (10.0 +/- 1.0 versus 9.0 +/- 1.1 kPa-1.10(-3)). Distensibility at 100 mm Hg decreased with aging (P < .05) and was not reduced in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive subjects after adjustment for age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationVascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Self-citationIntengan, H. D., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2000) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.36.3.312 · Cited by 459
Age-related vascular stiffening: causes and consequences
Kohn, J. C., Lampi, M. C., & Reinhart-King, C. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00112 · Cited by 440
“Carotid-femoral PWV measurements are correlated with arterial stiffness and can be used to predict cardiovascular disease in patients (Laurent et al., 1994; Safar et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodStructural and Genetic Bases of Arterial Stiffness
Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P., & Lacolley, P. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000164580.39991.3d · Cited by 435
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurent, S., Caviezel, B., Beck, L., Girerd, X., Billaud, E., Boutouyrie, P., Hoeks, A., & Safar, M.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6_pt_2
- Pages
- 878-883
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2128319000
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.23.6.878
- The paper
- Laurent, S., Caviezel, B., Beck, L., Girerd, X., Billaud, E., Boutouyrie, P., Hoeks, A., & Safar, M. (1994). Carotid artery distensibility and distending pressure in hypertensive humans. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.23.6.878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.