Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Nitric Oxide Inhibition Model Six Years On

Open access
Zatz, Roberto, Baylis, Christine·1998·Hypertension

Abstract

T he discovery in 1987 that endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) mediates the vasodilatory effect of certain endothelium-dependent agonists 1,2 inaugurated the current huge field of NO biology.It is now recognized that NO plays essential roles in many diverse physiological processes and in some pathophysiologic events.Development of these concepts has been based largely on evidence obtained by limiting NO biosynthesis.This review is centered on the cardiovascular and particularly the renal functional and structural consequences of chronic pharmacologic NO inhibition by L-arginine analogues.We devoted special attention to the mechanisms of hypertension and organ injury that occur under these circumstances, while appreciating the inherent limitations surrounding interpretation of this data. Ubiquity and Heterogeneity of NO BiosynthesisNO is made by the enzymatic action of several widely distributed NO synthases (NOS).In the presence of the substrates L-arginine and oxygen, as well as a number of essential cofactors, NO is produced in response to appropriate stimuli.The constitutively expressed NOS play a major role in the physiological control of vascular tone and kidney function.3,4 Vascular endothelial NOS (eNOS) and brain-type NOS (bNOS) are widely distributed throughout the kidney 5 as well as the cardiovascular system and in strategic locations in the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS).6,7 Both eNOS and particularly bNOS are abundant in the kidney, glomeruli, and vasculature as well as in most segments of the tubule, 3,5 and NOS activity in medulla is considerably greater than in cortex.8 NO generated within the kidney controls the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), total renal and medullary blood flow, pressure natriuresis, epithelial sodium transport, and production of various vasoactive factors including renin.[3][4][5] eNOS is distributed throughout most parts of the arterial and venous circulation, although there is considerable heterogeneity in the extent to which NO controls tone in regional circulations.9 Although there is some basal NO release from eNOS, shear stress is the physiologically important regulator of vascular NO production.3 In the CNS, NO is made in the nucleus tractus solitarius, the paraventricular nucleus, and the ventral medulla and can control sympathetic outflow.6,10 In addition to central regulation of efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity, there is direct nitrergic innervation to several locations including the renal vasculature.7

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.32.6.958

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Zatz, R., & Baylis, C.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1998-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
958-964
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W1995116171
Cited by
255
References
2
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Nitric Oxide Inhibition Model Six Years On. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.32.6.958
The paper
Zatz, R., & Baylis, C. (1998). Chronic Nitric Oxide Inhibition Model Six Years On. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.32.6.958

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.