The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrinsic Stiffness of the Carotid Arterial Wall Material in Essential Hypertensives
Open accessAbstract
Abstract —We have previously shown that the decrease in large artery distensibility observed in patients with essential hypertension (HT group) was primarily due to an increase in distending pressure and not to hypertension-associated structural modifications of the artery, suggesting a functional adaptation of the wall material. To evaluate the elastic properties of the wall material of the common carotid artery, we determined Young’s incremental elastic modulus (Einc) in the HT group and in normotensive subjects (NT group) as a function of blood pressure and circumferential wall stress. In 102 HT patients with never-treated essential hypertension and 40 age- and gender-matched NT subjects, the Einc-pressure and Einc-stress curves were calculated from intima-media thickness and from diameter and pressure waveforms, determined with echo tracking and aplanation tonometry, respectively. The “effective” stiffness of the wall material, determined through Einc calculated at mean blood pressure, was significantly higher in the HT than in the NT group. The “intrinsic” stiffness of the wall material, determined through Einc calculated at a common circumferential wall stress, did not differ between the 2 groups. However, when each group (HT and NT) was analyzed according to tertiles of age, the “intrinsic” stiffness of the arterial wall material was increased only in younger HT patients. In middle-aged and older HT patients, the intrinsic mechanical properties of the carotid arterial wall material were unchanged, and the increased stiffness of the common carotid artery in the HT group was due primarily to the increased level of blood pressure. These results also indicate that the deleterious effects of aging and hypertension on “intrinsic” stiffness are not additive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationVascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Self-citationKhamdaeng, T., Luo, J., Vappou, J., Terdtoon, P., & Konofagou, E. E. (2012) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.006 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Bussy, C., Boutouyrie, P., Lacolley, P., Challande, P., & Laurent, S.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1049-1054
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W1972202718
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic Stiffness of the Carotid Arterial Wall Material in Essential Hypertensives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.35.5.1049
- The paper
- Bussy, C., Boutouyrie, P., Lacolley, P., Challande, P., & Laurent, S. (2000). Intrinsic Stiffness of the Carotid Arterial Wall Material in Essential Hypertensives. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.35.5.1049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.