Cited by 156Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionElasticity and Material ModelingUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Arterial stiffness identification of the human carotid artery using the stress–strain relationship in vivo

Open access
Khamdaeng, T., Luo, J., Vappou, J., Terdtoon, P., Konofagou, E.E.·2012·Ultrasonics

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is well accepted as a reliable indicator of arterial disease. Increase in carotid arterial stiffness has been associated with carotid arterial disease, e.g., atherosclerotic plaque, thrombosis, stenosis, etc. Several methods for carotid arterial stiffness assessment have been proposed. In this study, in vivo noninvasive assessment using applanation tonometry and an ultrasound-based motion estimation technique was applied in seven healthy volunteers (age 28±3.6years old) to determine pressure and wall displacement in the left common carotid artery (CCA), respectively. The carotid pressure was obtained using a calibration method by assuming that the mean and diastolic blood pressures remained constant throughout the arterial tree. The regional carotid arterial wall displacement was estimated using a 1D cross-correlation technique on the ultrasound radio frequency (RF) signals acquired at a frame rate of 505-1010Hz. Young's moduli were estimated under two different assumptions: (i) a linear elastic two-parallel spring model and (ii) a two-dimensional, nonlinear, hyperelastic model. The circumferential stress (σ(θ)) and strain (ɛ(θ)) relationship was then established in humans in vivo. A slope change in the circumferential stress-strain curve was observed and defined as the transition point. The Young's moduli of the elastic lamellae (E(1)), elastin-collagen fibers (E(2)) and collagen fibers (E(3)) and the incremental Young's moduli before ( [Formula: see text] ) and after the transition point ( [Formula: see text] ) were determined from the first and second approach, respectively, to describe the contribution of the complex mechanical interaction of the different arterial wall constituents. The average moduli E(1), E(2) and E(3) from seven healthy volunteers were found to be equal to 0.15±0.04, 0.89±0.27 and 0.75±0.29MPa, respectively. The average moduli [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the intact wall (both the tunica adventitia and tunica media layers) were found to be equal to 0.16±0.04MPa and 0.90±0.25MPa, respectively. The average moduli [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the tunica adventitia were found to be equal to 0.18±0.05MPa and 0.84±0.22MPa, respectively. The average moduli [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the tunica media were found to be equal to 0.19±0.05MPa and 0.90±0.25MPa, respectively. The stiffness of the carotid artery increased with strain during the systolic phase. In conclusion, the feasibility of measuring the regional stress-strain relationship and stiffness of the normal human carotid artery was demonstrated noninvasively in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khamdaeng, T., Luo, J., Vappou, J., Terdtoon, P., & Konofagou, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Konofagou, E.E.
Venue
Ultrasonics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
402-411
ISSN
0041-624X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140732194
Cited by
156
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasonics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098830)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
arterial stiffness, carotid artery, stress-strain behavior, Young's modulus, applanation tonometry, cross correlation function, hyperelastic material models, elastic lamellae, collagen fibers, adventitia, tunica media, hoop stress, wall displacement
MeSH terms
Adult, Carotid Arteries, Humans, Male, Manometry, Models, Theoretical, Stress, Mechanical, Ultrasonography, Tunica Media, Radio Frequency Identification Device, Vascular Stiffness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review