The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estradiol Metabolites Inhibit Endothelin Synthesis by an Estrogen Receptor-Independent Mechanism
Abstract
Estradiol inhibits endothelin-1 synthesis, an effect that may contribute to the cardiovascular protective effects of estradiol. Recent findings that estradiol inhibits neointima formation in mice lacking estrogen receptors suggests that the cardiovascular protective effects of estradiol may be mediated by means of an estrogen receptor-independent mechanism. Because 2-hydroxyestradiol and 2-methoxyestradiol, metabolites of estradiol with little/no affinity for estrogen receptors, are more potent than estradiol in inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell growth, we investigated whether these metabolites also inhibit endothelin-1 synthesis by means of an receptor-independent mechanism. Treatment of porcine coronary artery endothelial cells for 4 to 24 hours with 0.001 to 1 μmol/L of estradiol, 2-hydroxyestradiol, or 2-methoxyestradiol concentration-dependently inhibited basal as well as serum-induced (2.5%), TNFα-induced (10 ng/mL), angiotensin II–induced (100 nmol/L), and thrombin-induced (4 U/mL) endothelin-1 synthesis. Estradiol, 2-hydroxyestradiol, and 2-methoxyestradiol also inhibited serum-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. As compared with estradiol, its metabolites were more potent in inhibiting endothelin-1 secretion and mitogen activated protein kinase activity. The inhibitory effects of 2-hydroxyestradiol and 2-methoxyestradiol on endothelin-1 release and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity were not blocked by ICI182780 (50 μmol/L), an estrogen receptor antagonist. Our findings indicate that the estradiol metabolites 2-hydroxyestradiol and 2-methoxyestradiol potently inhibit endothelin-1 synthesis by means of an estrogen receptor-independent mechanism. This effect of estradiol metabolites may be mediated by inhibition of mitogen activated protein kinase activity and may contribute to the cardioprotective effects of estradiol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estrogen-induced cardiorenal protection: potential cellular, biochemical and molecular mechanisms.
Dubey, R. K., & Jackson, E. K. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.3.f365 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
Mechanistic Pathways of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease
Regitz-Zagrosek, V., & Kararigas, G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2015 · Cited by 732
Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone
Orshal, J. M., & Khalil, R. A. (2004) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00338.2003 · Cited by 650
Vascular Actions of Estrogens: Functional Implications
Miller, V. M., & Duckles, S. P. (2008) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.107.08002 · Cited by 593
Dubey, R. (2002) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00527-2 · Cited by 571
Self-citationSex-specific differences in hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease
Colafella, K. M. M., & Denton, K. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2017.189 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubey, R. K., Jackson, E. K., Keller, P. J., Imthurn, B., & Rosselli, M.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 640-644
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2018813284
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.