Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Capability of Human Bone Marrow Cells After Myocardial Infarction

Fernández-Avilés, Francisco, San Román, José Alberto, García-Frade, Javier, Fernández, María Eugenia, Peñarrubia, María Jesús, de la Fuente, Luis, Gómez-Bueno, Manuel, Cantalapiedra, Alberto, Fernández, Jesús, Gutierrez, Oliver, Sánchez, Pedro L., Hernández, Carolina, Sanz, Ricardo, García-Sancho, Javier, Sánchez, Ana·2004·Circulation Research

Abstract

Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs) from 20 patients with extensive reperfused myocardial infarction (MI) were used to assess their myocardial regenerative capability “in vitro” and their effect on postinfarction left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Human BMCs were labeled, seeded on top of cryoinjured mice heart slices, and cultured. BMCs showed tropism for and ability to graft into the damaged mouse cardiac tissue and, after 1 week, acquired a cardiomyocyte phenotype and expressed cardiac proteins, including connexin43. In the clinical trial, autologous BMCs (78±41×10 6 per patient) were intracoronarily transplanted 13.5±5.5 days after MI. There were no adverse effects on microvascular function or myocardial injury. No major cardiac events occurred up to 11±5 months. At 6 months, magnetic resonance showed a decrease in the end-systolic volume, improvement of regional and global LV function, and increased thickness of the infarcted wall, whereas coronary restenosis was only 15%. No changes were found in a nonrandomized contemporary control group. Thus, BMCs are capable of nesting into the damaged myocardium and acquire a cardiac cell phenotype in vitro as well as safely benefiting ventricular remodeling in vivo. Large-scale randomized trials are needed now to assess the clinical efficacy of this treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.0000144798.54040.ed

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-Avilés, F., San Román, J. A., García-Frade, J., Fernández, M. E., Peñarrubia, M. J., de la Fuente, L., Gómez-Bueno, M., Cantalapiedra, A., Fernández, J., Gutierrez, O., Sánchez, P. L., Hernández, C., Sanz, R., García-Sancho, J., & Sánchez, A.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2004-10
Volume
95
Issue
7
Pages
742-748
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2135358140
Cited by
467
References
2
FWCI
30.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Capability of Human Bone Marrow Cells After Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.0000144798.54040.ed
The paper
Fernández-Avilés, F., San Román, J. A., García-Frade, J., Fernández, M. E., Peñarrubia, M. J., de la Fuente, L., Gómez-Bueno, M., Cantalapiedra, A., Fernández, J., Gutierrez, O., Sánchez, P. L., Hernández, C., Sanz, R., García-Sancho, J., & Sánchez, A. (2004). Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Capability of Human Bone Marrow Cells After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000144798.54040.ed

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.