Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cardiac-Specific Ablation of the Na + -Ca 2+ Exchanger Confers Protection Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Imahashi, Kenichi, Pott, Christian, Goldhaber, Joshua I., Steenbergen, Charles, Philipson, Kenneth D., Murphy, Elizabeth·2005·Circulation Research

Abstract

During ischemia and reperfusion, with an increase in intracellular Na + and a depolarized membrane potential, Ca 2+ may enter the myocyte in exchange for intracellular Na + via reverse-mode Na + -Ca 2+ exchange (NCX). To test the role of Ca 2+ entry via NCX during ischemia and reperfusion, we studied mice with cardiac-specific ablation of NCX (NCX-KO) and demonstrated that reverse-mode Ca 2+ influx is absent in the NCX-KO myocytes. Langendorff perfused hearts were subjected to 20 minutes of global ischemia followed by 2 hours of reperfusion, during which time we monitored high-energy phosphates using 31 P-NMR and left-ventricular developed pressure. In another group of hearts, we monitored intracellular Na + using 23 Na-NMR. Consistent with Ca 2+ entry via NCX during ischemia, we found that hearts lacking NCX exhibited less of a decline in ATP during ischemia, delayed ischemic contracture, and reduced maximum contracture. Furthermore, on reperfusion following ischemia, NCX-KO hearts had much less necrosis, better recovery of left-ventricular developed pressure, improved phosphocreatine recovery, and reduced Na + overload. The improved recovery of function following ischemia in NCX-KO hearts was not attributable to the reduced preischemic contractility in NCX-KO hearts, because when the preischemic workload was matched by treatment with isoproterenol, NCX-KO hearts still exhibited improved postischemic function compared with wild-type hearts. Thus, NCX-KO hearts were significantly protected against ischemia-reperfusion injury, suggesting that Ca 2+ entry via reverse-mode NCX is a major cause of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.0000187456.06162.cb

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Imahashi, K., Pott, C., Goldhaber, J. I., Steenbergen, C., Philipson, K. D., & Murphy, E.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2005-10-28
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
916-921
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2116884436
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac-Specific Ablation of the Na + -Ca 2+ Exchanger Confers Protection Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.0000187456.06162.cb
The paper
Imahashi, K., Pott, C., Goldhaber, J. I., Steenbergen, C., Philipson, K. D., & Murphy, E. (2005). Cardiac-Specific Ablation of the Na + -Ca 2+ Exchanger Confers Protection Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000187456.06162.cb

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.