The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Programming Smooth Muscle Plasticity With Chromatin Dynamics
Abstract
Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) possess remarkable phenotypic plasticity that allows rapid adaptation to fluctuating environmental cues. For example, vascular SMCs undergo profound changes in their phenotype during neointimal formation in response to vessel injury or within atherosclerotic plaques. Recent studies have shown that interaction of serum response factor (SRF) and its numerous accessory cofactors with CArG box DNA sequences within promoter chromatin of SMC genes is a nexus for integrating signals that influence SMC differentiation in development and disease. During development, SMC-restricted sets of posttranslational histone modifications are acquired within the CArG box chromatin of SMC genes. These modifications in turn control the chromatin-binding properties of SRF. The histone modifications appear to encode a SMC-specific epigenetic program that is used by extracellular cues to influence SMC differentiation, by regulating binding of SRF and its partners to the chromatin template. Thus, SMC differentiation is dynamically regulated by the interplay between SRF accessory cofactors, the SRF–CArG interaction, and the underlying histone modification program. As such, the inherent plasticity of the SMC lineage offers unique glimpses into how cellular differentiation is dynamically controlled at the level of chromatin within the context of changing microenvironments. Further elucidation of how chromatin regulates SMC differentiation will undoubtedly yield valuable insights into both normal developmental processes and the pathogenesis of several vascular diseases that display detrimental SMC phenotypic behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological control through regulated transcriptional coactivators
Spiegelman, B. M., & Heinrich, R. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.037 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Shankman, L. S., Gomez, D., Cherepanova, O. A., Salmon, M., Alencar, G. F., Haskins, R. M., Swiatlowska, P., Newman, A. A. C., Greene, E. S., Straub, A. C., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3866 · Cited by 1,218
Self-citationSmooth muscle cell phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis
Gomez, D., & Owens, G. K. (2012) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvs115 · Cited by 866
Self-citationAlexander, M. R., & Owens, G. K. (2012) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142315 · Cited by 773
Self-citationSmooth muscle cell fate and plasticity in atherosclerosis
Allahverdian, S., Chaabane, C., Boukais, K., Francis, G. A., & Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L. (2018) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvy022 · Cited by 507
MicroRNA‐26a is a novel regulator of vascular smooth muscle cell function
Leeper, N. J., Raiesdana, A., Kojima, Y., Chun, H. J., Azuma, J., Maegdefessel, L., Kundu, R. K., Quertermous, T., Tsao, P. S., & Spin, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.22422 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, O. G., & Owens, G. K.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 2007-05-25
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1428-1441
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2113939866
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programming Smooth Muscle Plasticity With Chromatin Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.0000266448.30370.a0
- The paper
- McDonald, O. G., & Owens, G. K. (2007). Programming Smooth Muscle Plasticity With Chromatin Dynamics. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000266448.30370.a0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.