The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of Local Blood Flow with Hydrogen Gas
Open accessAbstract
When a platinized platinum electrode is polarized at the potential of the standard calomel electrode, the current generated is proportional to the concentration of dissolved hydrogen gas. The effects of physiological variations in oxygen tension, pH, temperature, and ascorbic acid concentration were found to be negligible. Although absolute calibration in vivo is not possible, the rate of tissue hydrogen saturation or desaturation can be measured by needle-shaped electrodes inserted into the tissue. Arterial and venous concentration can be measured with catheter electrodes. Solubility of hydrogen gas in kidney slices was found to be the same as in blood. With the assumption that tissue is in instantaneous diffusion equilibrium with local venous blood with respect to hydrogen, the local blood flow per volume of tissue can be calculated according to the Fick principle from the rate of tissue desaturation when arterial concentration is lowered to zero. The method was tested on dogs in myocardium, kidney, and skeletal muscle. Hydrogen was administered by respiration or by intra-arterial infusion of hydrogen-saturated saline, giving an arterial concentration of 3% to 5% saturation. Tissue desaturation curves were recorded simultaneously from two to three tissue electrodes. Good agreement with flow measured simultaneously with other methods was obtained in myocardium and renal cortex, while the data on skeletal muscle do not permit any definite conclusion. The main virtue of this method lies in the fact that repeated measurements of local blood flow can be obtained without access to arterial or local venous blood. Reliable measurements of regional blood flow were also obtained from continuously recorded venous desaturation curves, which also provide information on the distribution of blood flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Control of Renal Function*
Kopp, U. C., & DiBona, G. F. (2020) · Reflex Control of the Circulation · doi:10.1201/9780367813338-17 · Cited by 1,126
Continuous measurement of tissue blood flow by laser-Doppler spectroscopy
Stern, M. D., Lappe, D. L., Bowen, P. D., Chimosky, J. E., Holloway, G. A., Keiser, H. R., & Bowman, R. L. (1977) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1977.232.4.h441 · Cited by 445
Neural Control of Renal Function
Johns, E. J., Kopp, U. C., & DiBona, G. F. (2011) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100043 · Cited by 278
How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: A review of techniques
Urbanavičius, L. (2011) · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.4240/wjgs.v3.i5.59 · Cited by 235
Local Cerebral Blood Flow and Vascular Reactivity in a Chronic Stable Stroke in Baboons
SYMON, L., CROCKARD, H. A., C.DORSCH, N. W., BRANSTON, N. M., & JUHASZ, J. (1975) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.6.5.482 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- AUKLAND, K., BOWER, B. F., & BERLINER, R. W.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1964-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-187
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2117057442
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Local Blood Flow with Hydrogen Gas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.14.2.164
- The paper
- AUKLAND, K., BOWER, B. F., & BERLINER, R. W. (1964). Measurement of Local Blood Flow with Hydrogen Gas. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.14.2.164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.