The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical Properties of Rat Cardiac Muscle during Experimental Hypertrophy
Abstract
The mechanical properties of trabecular muscles from the hearts of 77 rats subjected to aortic arch constriction were compared with those from 77 unoperated and sham-operated control animals at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after operation. Significant hypertrophy, as evidenced by an increase in left ventricle to body weight ratio, was first seen at three days ( P < 0.02), reached a maximum of 30 to 40% by seven days ( P < 0.001), and remained relatively constant throughout the remainder of the experiment. Depression of isotonic shortening velocity and maximum isometric force of trabecular muscles from hypertrophied hearts was first seen at seven days. These changes persisted at 14 and 28 days. When alterations in muscle mechanics due to changes in muscle thickness were taken into consideration, muscles from hypertrophied hearts demonstrated a depressed maximum velocity of shortening ( P < 0.001), while development of isometric tension was unaltered. The latter appeared to be maintained at least in part by a prolonged contraction time, as reflected by increases in the time to peak isometric tension ( P < 0.05) and the time to peak "unloaded" isotonic shortening ( P < 0.001). Resting tension was increased in trabecular muscles from hypertrophied hearts. Tissue hydroxyproline concentration was elevated with hypertrophy. The observed depression in muscle shortening velocity at light loads may be explained by altered contractile state or by increased stiffness of the parallel elastic element.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conrad, C. H., Brooks, W. W., Hayes, J. A., Sen, S., Robinson, K. G., & Bing, O. H. L. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.91.1.161 · Cited by 447
Self-citationAurigemma, G. P., Silver, K. H., Priest, M. A., & Gaasch, W. H. (1995) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00153-q · Cited by 399
Julius, B. K., Spillmann, M., Vassalli, G., Villari, B., Eberli, F. R., & Hess, O. M. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.4.892 · Cited by 159
Aoyagi, T., Fujii, A. M., Flanagan, M. F., Arnold, L. W., Brathwaite, K. W., Colan, S. D., & Mirsky, I. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2415 · Cited by 66
Carruth, E. D., McCulloch, A. D., & Omens, J. H. (2016) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.11.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- BING, O. H. L., MATSUSHITA, S., FANBURG, B. L., & LEVINE, H. J.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1971-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-245
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2031753698
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical Properties of Rat Cardiac Muscle during Experimental Hypertrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.28.2.234
- The paper
- BING, O. H. L., MATSUSHITA, S., FANBURG, B. L., & LEVINE, H. J. (1971). Mechanical Properties of Rat Cardiac Muscle during Experimental Hypertrophy. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.28.2.234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.