The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional Myocardial Blood Flow in Lambs with Concentric Right Ventricular Hypertrophy
Open accessAbstract
Chronically hypertrophied right ventricles function normally under high systolic pressures, whereas normal right ventricles fail when they are acutely subjected to similar pressures. This phenomenon may be partly due to adaptation of the coronary circulation as well as to hypertrophy. Knowledge of the magnitude and distribution of coronary blood flow and the degree of coronary vascular reserve are important in understanding the function of hypertrophied myocardium. We studied these variables in 16 awake, 5-12-week-old, tranquilized lambs; 9 of the lambs had had their main pulmonary artery banded at 2 days of age. Pressures, cardiac output, and coronary blood flow (radioactive microsphere method) were measured at rest and during two stress states--isoproterenol and dextran infusion. Ventricular function was similar in control and banded lambs. We found significant right ventricular hypertension and both right ventricular and septal hypertrophy in the banded lambs. Total coronary blood flow per gram was slightly higher in banded lambs in all states, and right ventricular flow per gram was significantly elevated at rest and during isoproterenol infusion. Right ventricular coronary resistance per gram was significantly lower in banded lambs in all states. These changes demonstrate that hypertrophied right ventricular tissue is not ischemic at rest, since there is vascular reserve. The changes also raise the question of increased vascularity in hypertrophied myocardium. Right ventricular oxygen supply per unit oxygen demand was increased in banded lambs at rest and during isoproterenol infusion. This finding suggests that hypertrophied myocardium has inefficient oxygen utilization, low oxygen extraction, or both.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of Cerebral Ischemia and Brain Trauma: Similarities and Differences
Bramlett, H. M., & Dietrich, W. D. (2004) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/01.wcb.0000111614.19196.04 · Cited by 631
Genetic Analysis of Inherited Hypertension in the Rat
Rapp, J. P. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.135 · Cited by 422
Rakusan, K., Flanagan, M. F., Geva, T., Southern, J., & Van Praagh, R. (1992) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.86.1.38 · Cited by 327
Potential Animal Models of Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review
Bailey, E. L., McCulloch, J., Sudlow, C., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.528430 · Cited by 128
Bailey, E. L., Wardlaw, J. M., Graham, D., Dominiczak, A. F., Sudlow, C. L. M., & Smith, C. (2011) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01170.x · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- ARCHIE, J. P., FIXLER, D. E., ULLYOT, D. J., BUCKBERG, G. D., & HOFFMAN, J. I. E.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1974-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-154
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2119406229
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Myocardial Blood Flow in Lambs with Concentric Right Ventricular Hypertrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.34.2.143
- The paper
- ARCHIE, J. P., FIXLER, D. E., ULLYOT, D. J., BUCKBERG, G. D., & HOFFMAN, J. I. E. (1974). Regional Myocardial Blood Flow in Lambs with Concentric Right Ventricular Hypertrophy. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.34.2.143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.