Cited by 299Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Interaction of Vasopressin and the Baroreceptor Reflex System in the Regulation of Arterial Blood Pressure in the Dog

COWLEY, ALLEN W., MONOS, EMIL, GUYTON, ARTHUR C.·1974·Circulation Research

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of 1-hour intravenous infusions of vasopressin were evaluated in trained, unanesthetized dogs in the normal state and following sinoaortic baroreceptor denervation. Pressor sensitivity to vasopressin was greatly enhanced following baroreceptor denervation; threshold sensitivity was increased 11-fold and sensitivity at higher dose levels was increased 60-100-fold. Infusion of physiological levels of vasopressin caused an average increase in arterial blood pressure of 33 mm Hg in conscious, baroreceptor-denervated dogs compared with an increase of 5 mm Hg in normal dogs. In contrast, similar intravenous infusions of norepinephrine at physiological levels resulted in a 3-fold increase in pressor sensitivity with no change in threshold dose. Hy-pophysectomy of baroreceptor-denervated dogs did not significantly alter their pressor sensitivity to vasopressin in the conscious state. The arterial blood pressure response to intravenous vasopressin infusions was greatly depressed when a high background level of circulating vasopressin was present. Decapitated, spinal, anesthetized dogs maintained with a small continuous infusion of norepinephrine exhibited the greatest sensitivity to vasopressin; the threshold dose for a pressor response was similar to that in conscious baroreceptor-denervated dogs, but pressor sensitivity at physiological dose levels was increased nearly 8, 000-fold. The elevations in arterial blood pressure resulting from vasopressin infusions of less than 1.0 munits/kg min -1 were large enough to implicate the direct pressor effect of vasopressin in the normal control of arterial blood pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.34.4.505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 299

Authors
COWLEY, A. W., MONOS, E., & GUYTON, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1974-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
505-514
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2143130004
Cited by
299
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
vasopressin, baroreflex, blood pressure regulation, baroreceptor denervation, norepinephrine, hypophysectomy, conscious dogs, spinal anesthesia
MeSH terms
Animals, Aorta, Thoracic, Blood Pressure, Cardiac Output, Denervation, Diabetes Insipidus, Dogs, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Heart Rate, Hypophysectomy, Norepinephrine, Pituitary Gland, Pressoreceptors, Vasopressins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review