Cited by 21Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans by arginine vasopressin

Open access
Floras, J S, Aylward, P E, Abboud, F M, Mark, A L·1987·Hypertension

Abstract

Arginine vasopressin, a potent vasoconstrictor, does not raise arterial pressure in normal humans even at pathophysiological plasma levels. To examine whether the pressor effect of vasopressin in humans is buffered by baroreceptor reflex inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity, we recorded postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity directly from the peroneal nerve in 12 normal men before, during, and after a 20-minute intravenous infusion of vasopressin, 4 ng/kg/min, that increased mean plasma concentrations from 6.2 +/- 0.6 to 320 +/- 68 (SE) pg/ml. During the first 5 minutes (n = 8), mean arterial pressure increased from 91 +/- 3 to 97 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) and integrated sympathetic nerve activity decreased from 271 +/- 45 to 156 +/- 33 units (p less than 0.05). At 15 minutes (n = 12), arterial pressure did not differ from control values whereas forearm vascular resistance fell (p less than 0.05) and central venous pressure and heart rate increased (p less than 0.05). Sympathetic nerve activity remained below control levels throughout the infusion (202 +/- 31 vs 254 +/- 40 units before infusion; p less than 0.05). An effect of vasopressin on ganglionic transmission was excluded, since the sympathoexcitatory response to apnea was not attenuated during vasopressin. Thus, pathophysiologic levels of vasopressin in humans cause inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity that is not due to a ganglionic blocking action. The sympathoinhibition may be caused in part by the modest increases in mean arterial and central venous pressures and attendant stimulation of arterial and cardiac baroreceptors. The reflex decrease in sympathetic nerve activity would be expected to buffer the direct vasoconstrictor effects of vasopressin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.10.4.409

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 10 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premiseown data

    AVP facilitated reflex forearm vasodilation during increases in venous return and central venous pressure produced by sudden release of lower body negative pressure.

    “AVP facilitated reflex forearm vasodilation during increases in venous return and central venous pressure produced by sudden release of lower body negative pressure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. Aylward PE, Floras JS, Leimbach WN, Abboud FM. Effect of vasopressin on the circulation and its baroreflex control in normal humans. Circulation 1986;73:1145-1154 source
  • Premisecitation

    In normal subjects, AVP infused intravenously at 4 ng/kg/min decreased resting forearm vascular resistance.

    “We have recently shown that AVP (4 ng/kg/min) infused intravenously in normal subjects decreased resting forearm vascular resistance.5”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. Aylward PE, Floras JS, Leimbach WN, Abboud FM. Effect of vasopressin on the circulation and its baroreflex control in normal humans. Circulation 1986;73:1145-1154 source
  • Findingown data

    During the first 5 minutes of AVP infusion (n=8), mean arterial pressure increased from 91 ± 3 to 97 ± 4 mm Hg (p<0.05).

    “During the first 5 minutes (n = 8), mean arterial pressure increased from 91 ± 3 to 97 ± 4 mm Hg (p<0.05)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    AVP infusion at 4 ng/kg/min increased mean plasma AVP concentrations from 6.2 ± 0.6 to 320 ± 68 pg/ml in normal men.

    “increased mean plasma concentrations from 6.2 ± 0.6 to 320 ± 68 (SE) pg/ml.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 15 minutes of AVP infusion (n=12), arterial pressure did not differ from control values.

    “At 15 minutes (n = 12), arterial pressue did not differ from control values”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    In normal subjects, AVP infusion at 4 ng/kg/min increased central venous pressure but did not raise mean arterial pressure or pulse pressure.

    “This response was accompanied by increases in central venous pressure, but mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure did not rise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. Aylward PE, Floras JS, Leimbach WN, Abboud FM. Effect of vasopressin on the circulation and its baroreflex control in normal humans. Circulation 1986;73:1145-1154 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Identification of sympathetic bursts by two independent observers had a mean intraobserver variability of 4.3% and a mean interobserver variability of 9.1%.

    “Mark et al. 18 reported a mean intraobserver variability of 4.3% and a mean interobserver variability of 9.1%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. Mark AL, Victor RG, Nerhed C, Wallin BG. Microneuro- graphic studies of the mechanisms of sympathetic nerve re- sponses to static exercise in humans. Circ Res 1985;57. 461-469 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During steady state AVP infusion, neither systolic, mean, nor diastolic arterial pressure was altered from control values.

    “During the steady state period, neither systolic, mean, nor diastolic arterial pressure was altered from control values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During steady state AVP infusion, SNA fell from 20.5 ± 2.8 to 17.3 ± 2.5 bursts/min, from 31.1 ± 3.9 to 23.8 ± 3.2 bursts/100 heartbeats, and from 254 ± 40 to 202 ± 31 units (integrated SNA).

    “SNA fell from 20.5 ±2.8 to 17.3 ±2.5 bursts/min, from 31.1 ±3.9 to 23.8 ±3.2 bursts/100 heartbeats, and from 254 ± 40 to 202 ± 31 units (integrated SNA) during steady state infusion of AVP”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the initial 10 minutes of AVP infusion, forearm resistance tended to increase briefly, but this was not significant.

    “Forearm resistance tended to increase briefly, but this was not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SNA adjusted for heart rate remained low (23.2 ± 3.9 bursts/100 heartbeats) 10 minutes after AVP infusion was stopped and then returned to control levels.

    “However, SNA adjusted for heart rate remained low (23.2 ± 3.9 bursts/100 heartbeats) 10 minutes after the AVP infusion was stopped”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the present study, forearm vasodilation was observed during the steady state period of AVP infusion when SNA was reduced.

    “In the present study, we again observed forearm vasodilation during the steady state period of the AVP infusion when SNA was reduced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SNA expressed as bursts per minute or integrated SNA rose toward control levels and was not significantly different from control during recovery.

    “SNA, expressed as bursts per minute or as integrated SNA, rose toward control levels and was not significantly different from control levels during recovery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Pathophysiologic levels of vasopressin in humans cause inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity that is not due to a ganglionic blocking action.

    “Thus, pathophysiologic levels of vasopressin in humans cause inhibition of muscle sympathetic nerve activity that is not due to a ganglionic blocking action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The sympathoexcitatory response to apnea is mediated by ganglionic transmission and would be attenuated by a ganglionic blocking action.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    During steady state AVP infusion, forearm vasodilation may be explained by sustained inhibition of SNA, which appears to override the direct constrictor effect of AVP in the forearm.

    “The forearm vasodilation may be explained by the sustained inhibition of SNA, which appears to override the direct constrictor effect of AVP in the forearm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Stable microneurographic recordings can be maintained and are not affected by time or infusion of vehicle.

    “Stable recordings can be maintained with the microneurographic technique and are not affected by time or infusion of vehicle.20”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] 20. Leimbach WN, Kempf J, Mark AL. Intraneural recordings of sympathetic nerve activity in humans before and after lidocaine [Abstract]. Clin Res 1986;33:8HA

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reflex decrease in sympathetic nerve activity would be expected to buffer the direct vasoconstrictor effects of vasopressin.

    “The reflex decrease in sympathetic nerve activity would be expected to buffer the direct vasoconstrictor effects of vasopressin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Since the reduction in SNA was not consistently associated with detectable increases in arterial pressure or central venous pressure, the possibility that AVP decreased SNA in part by sensitizing baroreceptor afferents or by a central neural action cannot be excluded.

    “However, since the reduction in SNA was not consistently associated with detectable increases in arterial pressure or central venous pressure, we cannot exclude the possibility that AVP decreased SNA in part by sensitizing baroreceptor afferents 12 -l5 or by a central neural action.8 - 12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Guo GB, Schmid PG, Abboud FM. Sites at which vasopressin facilitates the arterial baroreflex in rabbits. Am J Physiol 1986;251:H644-H655

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15] 15. Abboud FM, Aylward PE, Floras JS, Gupta BN. Sensitization of aortic and cardiac receptors by arginine vasopressin in mam- mals. J Physiol (Lond) 1986;377:251-265 source
    • cites [8] 8. Liard J-F, Deriaz O, Tschopp M, Schoun J. Cardiovascular effects of vasopressin infused into the vertebral circulation of conscious dogs. Clin Sci 1981;61:345-347 source
13 of 13
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sympathoexcitatory response to apnea is mediated by ganglionic transmission and would be attenuated by a ganglionic blocking action.

    “This stimulus increased sympathetic discharge and served 1) to determine the stability of the recording site throughout the experiment at times when basal activity was suppressed and 2) to determine whether AVP might inhibit efferent sympathetic activity through a ganglionic blocking action.”
    “An effect of vasopressin on ganglionic transmission was excluded, since the sympathoexcitatory response to apnea was not attenuated during vasopressin.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The measured increases in central venous pressure (averaging 1 mm Hg) and transient increases in arterial pressure are sufficient to stimulate arterial and cardiac baroreceptors and produce reflex sympathoinhibition.

    “The sympathoinhibition we observed could be attributed to stimulation of arterial or cardiopulmonary receptors by these changes, resulting in a reflex withdrawal of efferent SNA.”
2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [5]5. Aylward PE, Floras JS, Leimbach WN, Abboud FM. Effect of vasopressin on the circulation and its baroreflex control in normal humans. Circulation 1986;73:1145-1154
  2. [12]12. Guo GB, Schmid PG, Abboud FM. Sites at which vasopressin facilitates the arterial baroreflex in rabbits. Am J Physiol 1986;251:H644-H655
  3. [20]20. Leimbach WN, Kempf J, Mark AL. Intraneural recordings of sympathetic nerve activity in humans before and after lidocaine [Abstract]. Clin Res 1986;33:8HA
  4. [26]26. Gupta BN, Abboud AL, Floras JS, Aylward PE, Abboud FM. Vasopressin facilitates vagally mediated inhibition of renal nerve activity during volume expansion. Am J Physiol 1987 (in press)
  5. [28]28. Guo GB, Thames MD, Abboud FM. Arterial baroreflexes in renal hypertensive rabbits. Circ Res 1983;53:223-234

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floras, J. S., Aylward, P. E., Abboud, F. M., & Mark, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1987-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
409-416
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2153984547
Cited by
21
References
31
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • National Institutes of Health (14388, HL14388)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-24962, HL-14388)
  • National Center for Research Resources
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
vasopressin, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, baroreflex, vasoconstriction, arterial pressure, forearm vascular resistance, central venous pressure, heart rate, apnea, ganglionic transmission, peroneal nerve
MeSH terms
Adult, Arginine Vasopressin, Humans, Male, Muscles, Pressoreceptors, Reflex, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review