The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dobutamine: development of a new catecholamine to selectively increase cardiac contractility.
Open accessAbstract
We systematically modified isoproterenol's chemical structure to reduce chronotropic, arrhythmogenic, and vascular side effects. Experiments on dogs showed that the resulting drug, dobutamine, had an inotropic efficacy as great as that of epinephrine due to a direct action on beta1 cardiac receptors. However, unlike epinephrine, dobutamine's effect on alpha and beta2 vascular receptors was slight. At equivalent inotropic doses, dobutamine had less than a fourth of the chronotropic effect of isoproterenol. Desmethylimipramine (DMI), which blocks the sympathetic nerve fiber uptake mechanism, had no effect on dobutamine's actions. In contrast, DMI antagonized dopamine's inotropic effect, and marked chronotropic and pressor responses occurred when we used doses of dopamine large enough to elicit a direct inotropic effect. Dobutamine increased the contractility of isolated cat papillary muscles more but the automaticity less than did isoproterenol. In ischemic dog hearts, dobutamine lacked significant arrhythmic activity, whereas dopamine, norepinephrine, and isoproterenol caused severe ectopic activity. In dogs with experimentally induced low cardiac contractility, low cardiac output, and hypotension, dobutamine produced dose-related increases in cardiac contractility and output, restored arterial blood pressure, and reduced total peripheral resistance slightly. In contrast, isoproterenol failed to restore blood pressure, had only a meager effect on cardiac contractility and output, cuased extreme tachycardia, and lowered peripheral resistance more than did dobutamine. Norepinephrine, which did not increase cardiac contractility or output as much as dobutamine, excessively elevated peripheral resistance and arterial blood pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Madison, D. V., & Nicoll, R. A. (1986) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016006 · Cited by 391
Dobutamine: A New Synthetic Cardioactive Sympathetic Amine
Koch-Weser, J., Sonnenblick, E. H., Frishman, W. H., & LeJemtel, T. H. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197901043000105 · Cited by 344
Low-Cardiac-Output Syndrome After Cardiac Surgery
Lomivorotov, V. V., Efremov, S. M., Kirov, M. Y., Fominskiy, E. V., & Karaskov, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.029 · Cited by 315
Sympathetic β1-adrenergic signaling contributes to regulation of human bone metabolism
Khosla, S., Drake, M. T., Volkman, T. L., Thicke, B. S., Achenbach, S. J., Atkinson, E. J., Joyner, M. J., Rosen, C. J., Monroe, D. G., & Farr, J. N. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci122151 · Cited by 132
Comparative haemodynamic effects of dopamine and dobutamine in septic shock.
Regnier, B., Safran, D., Carlet, J., & Teisseire, B. (1979) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01683192 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuttle, R. R., & Mills, J.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1975-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 185-196
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W1968925070
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dobutamine: development of a new catecholamine to selectively increase cardiac contractility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.36.1.185
- The paper
- Tuttle, R. R., & Mills, J. (1975). Dobutamine: development of a new catecholamine to selectively increase cardiac contractility. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.36.1.185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.