Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Competition between sympathetic vasoconstriction and metabolic vasodilation in the canine coronary circulation.

Open access
Mohrman, D E, Feigl, E O·1978·Circulation Research

Abstract

The role of a-receptor constriction of coronary vessels in response to cardiac sympathetic activation was evaluated in closed-chest, chloralose-anesthetized dogs.Cardiac sympathetic activation was produced (1) directly by intracoronary norepinephrine infusion at several different rates and ( 2) reflexly by carotid sinus hypotension.The resulting changes in coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption were recorded before and after a-receptor blockade with dibozane (3.0 mg/kg, iv) or phenoxybenzamine (0.5 mg/kg, intracoronary).The changes in coronary blood flow were normalized to changes in myocardial metabolism by division of the oxygen delivery (coronary flow times arterial oxygen content) by the change in myocardial oxygen consumption per 100 g of myocardium.Before a-receptor blockade, either intracoronary norepinephrine infusion or reflex sympathetic activation from the carotid sinus resulted in an increase of only 0.85 ml/100 g mirr' in oxygen delivery for each increase of 1 ml/100 g min" 1 in cardiac oxygen consumption.Under these circumstances, myocardial oxygen extraction increased and coronary venous oxygen content fell.After a-receptor blockade, either intracoronary norepinephrine infusion or a carotid sinus reflex resulted in an increase of 1.23 ml/100 g min ' in oxygen delivery for each increase of 1 ml/100 g min' 1 in cardiac oxygen consumption.Myocardial oxygen extraction and coronary venous oxygen content changed only slightly after a-receptor blockade.The greater coronary vasodilation and lesser change in cardiac oxygen extraction after a-receptor blockade were significantly different (P < 0.001) from the values before blockade.It is concluded that the coronary a-receptor constrictor mechanism competes with metabolic vasodilation during sympathetic activation even when there are large increases in myocardial metabolism.The net effect of the a-receptor constrictor influence is to restrict the metabolically related flow increase by about 30%, thus increasing oxygen extraction and decreasing coronary venous oxygen content.IT HAS LONG been known that stimulation of the sympathetic innervation of the heart results in tachycardia and augmented contractility, accompanied by increased myocardial oxygen consumption, increased coronary blood flow, and decreased coronary sinus oxygen content. 1 " 8 Coronary sinus oxygen content decreases because

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.42.1.79

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Mohrman, D. E., & Feigl, E. O.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1978-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2047346600
Cited by
268
References
0
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition between sympathetic vasoconstriction and metabolic vasodilation in the canine coronary circulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.42.1.79
The paper
Mohrman, D. E., & Feigl, E. O. (1978). Competition between sympathetic vasoconstriction and metabolic vasodilation in the canine coronary circulation. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.42.1.79

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.