The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation.
Open accessAbstract
The pressure-flow characteristics of 100 left circumflex stenoses in 10 chronically instrumented unsedated dogs were studied under resting conditions and during pharmacological coronary vasodilation. At rest, the pressure loss (deltaP) due to a stenosis and arterial flow velocity (V) were related by the equation, deltaP = FV + SV2, where F is the coefficient of pressure loss due to viscous friction in the stenotic segment and S is the coefficient of pressure loss due to flow separation at the diverging end of the stenosis. The linear term due to viscous friction accounted for 65% and the nonlinear term due to flow separation accounted for 35% of the total pressure loss at resting coronary flow. At peak coronary flow after coronary vasodilation, the pressure loss due to viscous friction accounted for 33% and pressure loss due to flow separation accounted for 67% of the total pressure loss. The pressure gradient-velocity relationship at high flows was characterized by the same general equation but with proportionately larger values of the coefficient S and therefore greater pressure loss associated with flow separation than predicted by the resting gradient-velocity relationship. The pressure loss predicted for high coronary flow velocities on the basis of the gradient-velocity equation at rest was only 64% of the actual experimentally observed pressure gradient at peak coronary flow. The augmented separation loss following coronary vasodilation probably was due to dilation of the epicardial artery adjacent to the fixed stenotic segment which caused more severe relative percent narrowing and a larger divergence angle at the distal end of the stenosis, the primary geometric determinants of separation losses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional Angiography
Manning, W. J., Li, W., & Edelman, R. R. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199303253281202 · Cited by 544
Benedict, C. R., Mathew, B., Rex, K. A., Cartwright, J., & Sordahl, L. A. (1986) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.58.1.58 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, K. L.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1978-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242-253
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2171820116
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.43.2.242
- The paper
- Gould, K. L. (1978). Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.43.2.242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.