The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional Angiography
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to assess the patency of coronary arteries by noninvasive means would represent an important advance. We have developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coronary angiographic technique that permits the display of areas of abnormal coronary blood flow. We have compared this method with conventional contrast angiography for the identification of coronary-artery stenoses. METHODS: MRI coronary angiography was performed with an electrocardiographically gated sequence in 39 subjects, 33 to 84 years of age, who were scheduled for elective cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography. Sequential overlapping transverse and oblique sections were acquired during periods of breath-holding and were displayed as cine loops for analysis. MRI and conventional angiographic data were compared in a blinded manner. The four major epicardial coronary arteries were classified by MRI coronary angiography as being normal (or having only minimal irregularities) or as having disease that was moderately severe to severe. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRI coronary angiography, as compared with conventional angiography, for correctly identifying individual vessels with > or = 50 percent angiographic stenoses were 90 percent and 92 percent, respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 0.85 and 0.95, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the technique were 100 percent and 100 percent, respectively, for the left main coronary artery, 87 percent and 92 percent for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 71 percent and 90 percent for the left circumflex coronary artery, and 100 percent and 78 percent for the right coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: MRI coronary angiography provides a new approach to evaluating the patency of coronary arteries. These preliminary data suggest that this technique may provide a noninvasive means of evaluating patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. At its current stage of development, this procedure may be most helpful for excluding clinically important stenoses in patients referred for diagnostic contrast angiography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease and the Acute Coronary Syndromes
Epstein, F. H., Fuster, V., Badimon, L., Badimon, J. J., & Chesebro, J. H. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199201303260506 · Cited by 3,725
The Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease and the Acute Coronary Syndromes
Epstein, F. H., Fuster, V., Badimon, L., Badimon, J. J., & Chesebro, J. H. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199201233260406 · Cited by 2,717
White, C. W., Wright, C. B., Doty, D. B., Hiratza, L. F., Eastham, C. L., Harrison, D. G., & Marcus, M. L. (1984) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198403293101304 · Cited by 1,222
Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging
Meyer, C. H., Hu, B. S., Nishimura, D. G., & Macovski, A. (1992) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910280204 · Cited by 866
Gould, K. L. (1978) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.43.2.242 · Cited by 368
Johnson, L. W., Lozner, E. C., Johnson, S., Krone, R., Pichard, A. D., Vetrovec, G. W., Noto, T. J., & The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (1989) · Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/ccd.1810170103 · Cited by 317
Manning, W. J., Atkinson, D. J., Grossman, W., Paulin, S., & Edelman, R. R. (1991) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(91)90754-w · Cited by 305
Self-citationFat-suppressed breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography.
Manning, W. J., Li, W., Boyle, N. G., & Edelman, R. R. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.87.1.94 · Cited by 282
Self-citationRogers, W. J., Shapiro, E. P., Weiss, J. L., BUCHALTER, M. B., Rademakers, F. E., Weisfeldt, M. L., & Zerhouni, E. A. (1991) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.84.2.721 · Cited by 167
Echocardiographic visualization of coronary artery anatomy in the adult
Douglas, P. S., Fiolkoski, J., Berko, B. A., & Reichek, N. (1988) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(88)91532-x · Cited by 81
Cited by
Achenbach, S., Moshage, W., Ropers, D., Nossen, J., & Daniel, W. G. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199812313392702 · Cited by 382
Stuber, M., Botnar, R. M., Danias, P. G., Sodickson, D. K., Kissinger, K. V., Van Cauteren, M., De Becker, J., & Manning, W. J. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00223-5 · Cited by 320
Self-citationStuber, M., Botnar, R. M., Danias, P. G., Kissinger, K. V., & Manning, W. J. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au50579 · Cited by 256
Self-citationMR angiography with blood pool contrast agents
Bremerich, J., Bilecen, D., & Reimer, P. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0712-0 · Cited by 139
Noninvasive coronary angiography—an acceptable alternative?
Achenbach, S., & Daniel, W. G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200112273452609 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, W. J., Li, W., & Edelman, R. R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-03-25
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 828-832
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2338675747
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 31.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional Angiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199303253281202
- The paper
- Manning, W. J., Li, W., & Edelman, R. R. (1993). A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional Angiography. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199303253281202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.