The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrastructural morphometric analysis of myocardium from dogs, rats, hamsters, mice, and from human hearts.
Abstract
Volume densities of mitochondria, myofibrils, and unspecified cytoplasm were measured by ultrastructural morphometry in myocardium from dogs, rats, hamsters, mice, and in biopsied tissue from human hearts. Human myocardium was composed of 23% mitochondria, 59% myofibrils, and 18% cytoplasm. Volume densities for mitochondria were 22% for dogs, 28% for rats and hamsters, and 32% for mice. Myofibrillar volume densities were highest in dogs with 63%, 57% for rats and hamsters, and 49% for mice. Differences were significant between all except man and dog, and rat and hamster. In an extensive analysis of canine myocardium, it could be shown that the quantitative composition of tissue from the left ventricular free wall (anterior, lateral, posterior) and the papillary muscles was identical. There were also no differences between subepi- and subendocardium as well as the midmyocardium. Volume densities from longitudinal sections were identical to those from transversal sections. Fixation with glutaraldehyde by perfusion or immersion provided identical results. There were no differences between volume densities in samples from the left ventricular free wall (anterior, lateral, and posterior) in rats, hamsters, and mice. It is concluded that each mammalian species is characterized by a very typical quantitative composition of the myocardium. The increase in mitochondrial volume correlated well with the increase in heart rate and oxygen consumption in smaller animals. These quantitative data are regarded as the morphological correlate of the differing functional capacity of hearts from different species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Engineering Adolescence: Maturation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes
Yang, X., Pabon, L., & Murry, C. E. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.300558 · Cited by 939
Mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target in heart failure
Brown, D. A., Perry, J. B., Allen, M. E., Sabbah, H. N., Stauffer, B. L., Shaikh, S. R., Cleland, J. G. F., Colucci, W. S., Butler, J., Voors, A. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.203 · Cited by 803
Tham, Y. K., Bernardo, B. C., Ooi, J. Y. Y., Weeks, K. L., & McMullen, J. R. (2015) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-015-1477-x · Cited by 708
Cardiomyocyte Maturation: New Phase in Development
Guo, Y., & Pu, W. T. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.119.315862 · Cited by 653
DeLong, J. P., Okie, J. G., Moses, M. E., Sibly, R. M., & Brown, J. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007783107 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaper, J., Meiser, E., & Stämmler, G.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-391
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2128653444
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrastructural morphometric analysis of myocardium from dogs, rats, hamsters, mice, and from human hearts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.56.3.377
- The paper
- Schaper, J., Meiser, E., & Stämmler, G. (1985). Ultrastructural morphometric analysis of myocardium from dogs, rats, hamsters, mice, and from human hearts. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.56.3.377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.