The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans.
Open accessAbstract
To investigate coupling between the heart and arterial system in normal subjects and cardiac patients, we determined both the slope of the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation (ventricular elastance) and the slope of the arterial end-systolic pressure-stroke volume relation (effective arterial elastance) in three groups of subjects: group A, 12 subjects with ejection fraction of 60% or more; group B, seven patients with ejection fraction of 40-59%; and group C, nine patients with ejection fraction of less than 40%. We also determined the left ventricular stroke work, end-systolic potential energy, and the ventricular work efficiency defined as stroke work per pressure-volume area (stroke work + potential energy). In group A, ventricular elastance was nearly twice as large as arterial elastance. This is a condition for a maximal mechanical efficiency. In group B, ventricular elastance was almost equal to arterial elastance. This is a condition for maximal stroke work from a given end-diastolic volume. In group C, ventricular elastance was less than one half of arterial elastance, which resulted in increased potential energy and decreased work efficiency. Thus, the present study suggests that ventriculoarterial coupling is normally set toward higher left ventricular work efficiency, whereas in patients with moderate cardiac dysfunction, ventricular and arterial properties are so matched as to maximize stroke work at the expense of the work efficiency. Neither the stroke work nor the work efficiency is near maximum for patients with severe cardiac dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schulman, S. P., Becker, L. C., Kass, D. A., Champion, H. C., Terrin, M. L., Forman, S., Ernst, K. V., Kelemen, M. D., Townsend, S. N., Capriotti, A., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.58 · Cited by 357
Single-beat estimation of right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship
Brimioulle, S., Wauthy, P., Ewalenko, P., Rondelet, B., Vermeulen, F., Kerbaul, F., & Naeije, R. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01023.2002 · Cited by 346
Palmieri, V., Bella, J. N., Arnett, D. K., Liu, J. E., Oberman, A., Schuck, M.-Y., Kitzman, D. W., Hopkins, P. N., Morgan, D., Rao, D. C., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.1.102 · Cited by 339
Invasive left ventricle pressure–volume analysis: overview and practical clinical implications
Bastos, M. B., Burkhoff, D., Maly, J., Daemen, J., den Uil, C. A., Ameloot, K., Lenzen, M., Mahfoud, F., Zijlstra, F., Schreuder, J. J., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz552 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Asanoi, H., Sasayama, S., & Kameyama, T.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-493
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2159514749
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.65.2.483
- The paper
- Asanoi, H., Sasayama, S., & Kameyama, T. (1989). Ventriculoarterial coupling in normal and failing heart in humans. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.65.2.483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.