The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poststroke Fatigue: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of Stroke Patients in Sweden
Abstract
Background and Purpose — Fatigue is common among stroke patients. This study determined the prevalence of fatigue among long-term survivors after stroke and what impact fatigue had on various aspects of daily life and on survival. Methods — This study was based on Riks-Stroke, a hospital-based national register for quality assessment of acute stroke events in Sweden. During the first 6 months of 1997, 8194 patients were registered in Riks-Stroke, and 5189 were still alive 2 years after the stroke. They were followed up by a mail questionnaire, to which 4023 (79%) responded. Patients who reported that they always felt depressed were excluded. Results — To the question, “Do you feel tired?” 366 (10.0%) of the patients answered that they always felt tired, and an additional 1070 (29.2%) were often tired. Patients who always felt tired were on average older than the rest of the study population (74.5 versus 71.5 years, P <0.001); therefore, all subsequent analyses were age adjusted. Fatigue was an independent predictor for having to move into an institutional setting after stroke. Fatigue was also an independent predictor for being dependent in primary activities of daily living functions. Three years after stroke, patients with fatigue also had a higher case fatality rate. Conclusions — Fatigue is frequent and often severe, even late after stroke. It is associated with profound deterioration of several aspects of everyday life and with higher case fatality, but it usually receives little attention by healthcare professionals. Intervention studies are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a fatigue scale
Chalder, T., Berelowitz, G., Pawlikowska, T., Watts, L., Wessely, S., Wright, D., & Wallace, E. P. (1993) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-p · Cited by 3,032
The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis
Fisk, J. D., Pontefract, A., Ritvo, P. G., Archibald, C. J., & Murray, T. J. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/s0317167100048691 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Billinger, S. A., Arena, R., Bernhardt, J., Eng, J. J., Franklin, B. A., Johnson, C. M., MacKay-Lyons, M., Macko, R. F., Mead, G. E., Roth, E. J., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000022 · Cited by 1,529
Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes
Reeves, M. J., Bushnell, C. D., Howard, G., Gargano, J. W., Duncan, P. W., Lynch, G., Khatiwoda, A., & Lisabeth, L. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70193-5 · Cited by 1,362
Fatigue in neurological disorders
Chaudhuri, A., & Behan, P. O. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15794-2 · Cited by 1,297
Molendijk, M., Molero, P., Ortuño Sánchez-Pedreño, F., Van der Does, W., & Angel Martínez-González, M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.022 · Cited by 550
Naess, H., Lunde, L., & Brogger, J. (2012) · Vascular Health and Risk Management · doi:10.2147/vhrm.s32780 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Glader, E.-L., Stegmayr, B., & Asplund, K.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1327-1333
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2142993126
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poststroke Fatigue: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of Stroke Patients in Sweden. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000014248.28711.d6
- The paper
- Glader, E.-L., Stegmayr, B., & Asplund, K. (2002). Poststroke Fatigue: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of Stroke Patients in Sweden. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000014248.28711.d6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.