Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Stroke Patient Who Woke Up: Clinical and Radiological Features, Including Diffusion and Perfusion MRI

Fink, John N., Kumar, Sandeep, Horkan, Clare, Linfante, Italo, Selim, Magdy H., Caplan, Louis R., Schlaug, Gottfried·2002·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose — Time of stroke onset is uncertain for patients who wake from sleep with stroke. Functional imaging techniques may allow estimation of benefit and risk of acute stroke therapy. We compared the clinical and multimodal MRI findings of patients with uncertain stroke onset with those with known onset time. Methods — Patients imaged within 24 hours of ischemic stroke onset between January 1997 and June 2000 were identified from a prospective stroke registry. Clinical and imaging data from patients with known stroke onset (group I) were compared with those who woke with stroke (group II). Results — A total of 364 patients were identified, of whom 100 (27%) woke from sleep with stroke. Group I and group II did not differ in age, gender, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) diagnoses. Time from stroke onset was shorter in group I (mean 6.0 versus 13.3 hours, P <0.001); time from detection did not differ between groups (6.0 versus 5.9 hours). Within 3 hours, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) lesion volumes were similar in both groups; DWI-PWI mismatch was present in 82% of group I and 73% of group II patients. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient of water (ADC) of group I patients was negatively associated with DWI volume (β=−0.324, P =0.004) and time from stroke onset (β=−0.238, P =0.031) in multivariate analysis. The mean ADC of group II patients was lower than that of group I patients within 3 hours of stroke detection (mean 556 versus 665 μm 2 /s, P <0.01), but individual group II patients had ADC values as high as 742 μm 2 /s, in addition to a DWI-PWI mismatch pattern. Conclusions — Onset time is uncertain in over one quarter of acute ischemic stroke patients. Clinical features of these patients do not differ significantly from those with known onset time. Some patients who wake with stroke seem to have favorable imaging characteristics for acute stroke therapy. Further study is needed to determine whether criteria for therapy based on imaging parameters can safely be applied to these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000014585.17714.67

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Fink, J. N., Kumar, S., Horkan, C., Linfante, I., Selim, M. H., Caplan, L. R., & Schlaug, G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2002-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
988-993
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2062047217
Cited by
233
References
1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Stroke Patient Who Woke Up: Clinical and Radiological Features, Including Diffusion and Perfusion MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000014585.17714.67
The paper
Fink, J. N., Kumar, S., Horkan, C., Linfante, I., Selim, M. H., Caplan, L. R., & Schlaug, G. (2002). The Stroke Patient Who Woke Up: Clinical and Radiological Features, Including Diffusion and Perfusion MRI. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000014585.17714.67

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.