Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

Open access
Fiebach, J.B., Schellinger, P.D., Jansen, O., Meyer, M., Wilde, P., Bender, J., Schramm, P., Jüttler, E., Oehler, J., Hartmann, M., Hähnel, S., Knauth, M., Hacke, W., Sartor, K.·2002·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has become a commonly used imaging modality in stroke centers. The value of this method as a routine procedure is still being discussed. In previous studies, CT was always performed before DWI. Therefore, infarct progression could be a reason for the better result in DWI. Methods— All hyperacute (<6 hours) stroke patients admitted to our emergency department with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >3 were prospectively randomized for the order in which CT and MRI were performed. Five stroke experts and 4 residents blinded to clinical data judged stroke signs and lesion size on the images. To determine the interrater variability, we calculated κ values for both rating groups. Results— A total of 50 patients with ischemic stroke and 4 patients with transient symptoms of acute stroke (median NIHSS score, 11; range, 3 to 27) were analyzed. Of the 50 patients, 55% were examined with DWI first. The mean delay from symptom onset until CT was 180 minutes; that from symptom onset until DWI was 189 minutes. The mean delay between DWI and CT was 30 minutes. The sensitivity of infarct detection by the experts was significantly better when based on DWI (CT/DWI, 61/91%). Accuracy was 91% when based on DWI (CT, 61%). Interrater variability of lesion detection was also significantly better for DWI (CT/DWI, κ=0.51/0.84). The assessment of lesion extent was less homogeneous on CT (CT/DWI, κ=0.38/0.62). The differences between the 2 modalities were stronger in the residents’ ratings (CT/DWI: sensitivity, 46/81%; κ=0.38/0.76). Conclusions— CT and DWI performed with the same delay after onset of ischemic stroke resulted in significant differences in diagnostic accuracy. DWI gives good interrater homogeneity and has a substantially better sensitivity and accuracy than CT even if the raters have limited experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Fiebach, J. B., Schellinger, P. D., Jansen, O., Meyer, M., Wilde, P., Bender, J., Schramm, P., Jüttler, E., Oehler, J., Hartmann, M., Hähnel, S., Knauth, M., Hacke, W., & Sartor, K.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2002-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
2206-2210
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2018151989
Cited by
507
References
3
FWCI
15.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb
The paper
Fiebach, J. B., Schellinger, P. D., Jansen, O., Meyer, M., Wilde, P., Bender, J., Schramm, P., Jüttler, E., Oehler, J., Hartmann, M., Hähnel, S., Knauth, M., Hacke, W., & Sartor, K. (2002). CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.