The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has become a commonly used imaging modality in stroke centers. The value of this method as a routine procedure is still being discussed. In previous studies, CT was always performed before DWI. Therefore, infarct progression could be a reason for the better result in DWI. Methods— All hyperacute (<6 hours) stroke patients admitted to our emergency department with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >3 were prospectively randomized for the order in which CT and MRI were performed. Five stroke experts and 4 residents blinded to clinical data judged stroke signs and lesion size on the images. To determine the interrater variability, we calculated κ values for both rating groups. Results— A total of 50 patients with ischemic stroke and 4 patients with transient symptoms of acute stroke (median NIHSS score, 11; range, 3 to 27) were analyzed. Of the 50 patients, 55% were examined with DWI first. The mean delay from symptom onset until CT was 180 minutes; that from symptom onset until DWI was 189 minutes. The mean delay between DWI and CT was 30 minutes. The sensitivity of infarct detection by the experts was significantly better when based on DWI (CT/DWI, 61/91%). Accuracy was 91% when based on DWI (CT, 61%). Interrater variability of lesion detection was also significantly better for DWI (CT/DWI, κ=0.51/0.84). The assessment of lesion extent was less homogeneous on CT (CT/DWI, κ=0.38/0.62). The differences between the 2 modalities were stronger in the residents’ ratings (CT/DWI: sensitivity, 46/81%; κ=0.38/0.76). Conclusions— CT and DWI performed with the same delay after onset of ischemic stroke resulted in significant differences in diagnostic accuracy. DWI gives good interrater homogeneity and has a substantially better sensitivity and accuracy than CT even if the raters have limited experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Cited by
Woodfield, R., Grant, I., UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group, UK Biobank Follow-Up and Outcomes Working Group, & Sudlow, C. L. M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140533 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiebach, J. B., Schellinger, P. D., Jansen, O., Meyer, M., Wilde, P., Bender, J., Schramm, P., Jüttler, E., Oehler, J., Hartmann, M., Hähnel, S., Knauth, M., Hacke, W., & Sartor, K.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2206-2210
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2018151989
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb
- The paper
- Fiebach, J. B., Schellinger, P. D., Jansen, O., Meyer, M., Wilde, P., Bender, J., Schramm, P., Jüttler, E., Oehler, J., Hartmann, M., Hähnel, S., Knauth, M., Hacke, W., & Sartor, K. (2002). CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.