The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Length of Stay of First-Ever Ischemic Stroke
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Accurate information about hospital resource utilization is necessary for management of healthcare service. The purpose of this study was to determine the demographic and clinical predictors of length of hospital stay (LOS) of acute care hospitalization for first-ever ischemic stroke patients. Methods— A group of 330 patients who suffered from first-ever ischemic stroke and were consecutively admitted to a medical center in southern Taiwan were followed prospectively. Because our intention was to identify the major predictors of LOS from the information available at admission, we evaluated only those factors that could be assessed at the time of admission. Univariate analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to identify the main predictors of LOS. Results— The median LOS was 7 days (mean, 11 days; range, 1 to 122 days). Among the prespecified demographic and clinical characteristics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission, the quadratic term of the initial NIHSS score, modified Barthel Index score at admission, small-vessel occlusion stroke, sex, and smoking were the main explanatory factors for LOS. In particular, for each 1-point increase in the total score of NIHSS, LOS increased approximately 1 day for patients with mild or moderate (score 0 to 15 points) neurological impairments, while LOS decreased approximately 1 day for patients with severe (score >15 points) neurological impairments. Conclusions— The severity of stroke, as rated by the total score on NIHSS, is an important factor that influences LOS after acute stroke hospitalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Adams, H. P., Davis, P. H., Leira, E. C., Chang, K.-C., Bendixen, B. H., Clarke, W. R., Woolson, R. F., & Hansen, M. D. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.1.126 · Cited by 1,456
Self-citation
Cited by
Weekends: A Dangerous Time for Having a Stroke?
Saposnik, G., Baibergenova, A., Bayer, N., & Hachinski, V. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000259622.78616.ea · Cited by 320
Patient length of stay and mortality prediction: A survey
Awad, A., Bader–El–Den, M., & McNicholas, J. (2017) · Health Services Management Research · doi:10.1177/0951484817696212 · Cited by 128
Zhao, L., Dai, Q., Chen, X., Li, S., Shi, R., Yu, S., Yang, F., Xiong, Y., & Zhang, R. (2016) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.11.012 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, K.-C., Tseng, M.-C., Weng, H.-H., Lin, Y.-H., Liou, C.-W., & Tan, T.-Y.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2670-2674
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2143331144
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Length of Stay of First-Ever Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000034396.68980.39
- The paper
- Chang, K.-C., Tseng, M.-C., Weng, H.-H., Lin, Y.-H., Liou, C.-W., & Tan, T.-Y. (2002). Prediction of Length of Stay of First-Ever Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000034396.68980.39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.