Cited by 128Machine Learning in HealthcareSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Patient length of stay and mortality prediction: A survey

Awad, Aya, Bader–El–Den, Mohamed, McNicholas, James·2017·Health Services Management Research

Abstract

Over the past few years, there has been increased interest in data mining and machine learning methods to improve hospital performance, in particular hospitals want to improve their intensive care unit statistics by reducing the number of patients dying inside the intensive care unit. Research has focused on prediction of measurable outcomes, including risk of complications, mortality and length of hospital stay. The length of stay is an important metric both for healthcare providers and patients, influenced by numerous factors. In particular, the length of stay in critical care is of great significance, both to patient experience and the cost of care, and is influenced by factors specific to the highly complex environment of the intensive care unit. The length of stay is often used as a surrogate for other outcomes, where those outcomes cannot be measured; for example as a surrogate for hospital or intensive care unit mortality. The length of stay is also a parameter, which has been used to identify the severity of illnesses and healthcare resource utilisation. This paper examines a range of length of stay and mortality prediction applications in acute medicine and the critical care unit. It also focuses on the methods of analysing length of stay and mortality prediction. Moreover, the paper provides a classification and evaluation for the analytical methods of the length of stay and mortality prediction associated with a grouping of relevant research papers published in the years 1984 to 2016 related to the domain of survival analysis. In addition, the paper highlights some of the gaps and challenges of the domain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0951484817696212

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current standards of estimating patient severity, such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation score, fail to incorporate medical characteristics beyond acute physiology.

    “However, current standards of estimating patient severity, such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation score, fail to incorporate medical characteristics beyond acute physiology45.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Awad, A., Bader–El–Den, M., & McNicholas, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • School of Computing, University of Portsmouth, UK
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Awad, Aya
Venue
Health Services Management Research
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
105-120
ISSN
  • 0951-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1044
OpenAlex
W2597843262
Cited by
128
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Services Management Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
length of stay prediction, mortality prediction, intensive care unit, intensive care, survival analysis, acute medicine, hospital performance, health care utilization, surrogate endpoints
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review