Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 652

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The ACCESS Study: Evaluation of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors

Open access
Schrader, Joachim, Lüders, Stephan, Kulschewski, Anke, Berger, Jürgen, Zidek, Walter, Treib, Johannes, Einhäupl, Karl, Diener, Hans Christoph, Dominiak, Peter·2003·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors (ACCESS) study was designed to assess the safety of modest blood pressure reduction by candesartan cilexetil in the early treatment of stroke. The study was also designed to provide an estimate of the number of cases required to perform a larger phase III efficacy study. Methods— Five hundred patients were recruited in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter phase II study. Results— This safety trial was stopped prematurely when 342 patients (339 valid) had been randomized because of an imbalance in end points. Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, and blood pressure on admission, on study onset, and within the whole study period were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, the cumulative 12-month mortality and the number of vascular events differed significantly in favor of the candesartan cilexetil group (odds ratio, 0.475; 95% CI, 0.252 to 0.895). There were no significant differences in concomitant medication and in number or type of side effects. Conclusions— Although the mechanisms by which angiotensin type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor blockade affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are still unresolved, the present study shows that early neurohumoral inhibition has similar beneficial effects in cerebral and in myocardial ischemia. The fact that no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event occurred as a result of hypotension is of significant clinical importance. When there is need for or no contraindication against early antihypertensive therapy, candesartan cilexetil is a safe therapeutic option according to the ACCESS results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000075777.18006.89

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 652

Metadata

Authors
Schrader, J., Lüders, S., Kulschewski, A., Berger, J., Zidek, W., Treib, J., Einhäupl, K., Diener, H. C., & Dominiak, P.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2003-07
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1699-1703
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2086199925
Cited by
652
References
0
FWCI
27.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ACCESS Study: Evaluation of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000075777.18006.89
The paper
Schrader, J., Lüders, S., Kulschewski, A., Berger, J., Zidek, W., Treib, J., Einhäupl, K., Diener, H. C., & Dominiak, P. (2003). The ACCESS Study: Evaluation of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000075777.18006.89

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.