CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Matched Comparison

Paolucci, Stefano, Antonucci, Gabriella, Grasso, Maria Grazia, Bragoni, Maura, Coiro, Paola, De Angelis, Domenico, Fusco, Francesca Romana, Morelli, Daniela, Venturiero, Vincenzo, Troisi, Elio, Pratesi, Luca·2003·Stroke
DOI 10.1161/01.str.0000102902.39759.d3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The goal of this study was to assess the specific influence of stroke etiology on rehabilitation results. Methods— This was a case-control study of 270 inpatients with sequelae of first stroke who were enrolled in homogeneous subgroups and matched for stroke severity, basal disability, age (within 1 year), sex, and onset admission interval (within 3 days) who were different only in terms of stroke origin, infarction versus hemorrhage. We compared the groups’ length of stay, efficiency and effectiveness of treatment, and percentage of low and high responder patients. Odds ratios of dropouts and of low and high therapeutic response were also quantified. Results— Compared with ischemic patients, hemorrhagic patients had significantly higher Canadian Neurological Scale and Rivermead Mobility Index scores at discharge; higher effectiveness and efficiency on the Canadian Neurological Scale, Barthel Index, and Rivermead Mobility Index; and a higher percentage of high responders on the Barthel Index. Hemorrhagic patients showed a probability of a high therapeutic response on the Barthel Index that was ≈2.5 times greater than that of ischemic patients (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 5.20; accuracy on prediction, 87.06%). Conclusions— The results of this study provide further evidence of better functional prognosis in stroke survivors with hemorrhagic stroke.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000102902.39759.d3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies support the same or even better functional prognosis in stroke survivors with hemorrhagic stroke, with age and initial stroke severity as the main prognostic factors.

    “Nevertheless, despite hemorrhagic stroke patients usually presenting with worse functional and clinical status compared to ischemic stroke, there are studies that support the same or even better functional prognosis in stroke survivors with hemorrhagic stroke, with age and initial stroke severity as the main prognostic factors [62, 63].”

    From Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1161/str.20.6.2728043 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/str.21.2.2305399 · DOI
  3. 10.1161/str.25.2.8303743 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/str.25.4.8160225 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/str.33.1.179 · DOI
  6. Rossi PW, Forer S, Wiechers D. Effective rehabilitation for patients with stroke: analysis of entry, functional gain, and discharge to community. J Neurol Rehabil. 1997; 11: 27–33.
  7. 10.1161/str.19.5.3363586 · DOI
  8. Basso A. Approaches to neuropsychological rehabilitation: language disorders. In: Meter MJ Benson AL Dialer L eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1989: 294–314.
  9. 10.1161/str.17.6.3810708 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Grasso, M. G., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., De Angelis, D., Fusco, F. R., Morelli, D., Venturiero, V., Troisi, E., & Pratesi, L.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • From Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia (S.P., G.A., M.G.G., M.B., P.C., D. De A., F.R.F., D.M., V.V., E.T., L.P.), and Department of Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza” (G.A.), Rome, Italy.
ORCID
Venue
Stroke
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2003-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
2861-2865
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
DOI
10.1161/01.str.0000102902.39759.d3
OpenAlex
W2104104806
Cited by
283
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke rehabilitation, functional outcome, stroke etiology, inpatient rehabilitation, Barthel Index, Canadian Neurological Scale, Rivermead Mobility Index, treatment response, length of hospital stay, rehabilitation dropout
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Brain Ischemia, Female, Humans, Italy, Length of Stay, Male, Neurologic Examination, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Prognosis, Rehabilitation Centers, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Recovery of Function, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review