The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Matched Comparison
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The goal of this study was to assess the specific influence of stroke etiology on rehabilitation results. Methods— This was a case-control study of 270 inpatients with sequelae of first stroke who were enrolled in homogeneous subgroups and matched for stroke severity, basal disability, age (within 1 year), sex, and onset admission interval (within 3 days) who were different only in terms of stroke origin, infarction versus hemorrhage. We compared the groups’ length of stay, efficiency and effectiveness of treatment, and percentage of low and high responder patients. Odds ratios of dropouts and of low and high therapeutic response were also quantified. Results— Compared with ischemic patients, hemorrhagic patients had significantly higher Canadian Neurological Scale and Rivermead Mobility Index scores at discharge; higher effectiveness and efficiency on the Canadian Neurological Scale, Barthel Index, and Rivermead Mobility Index; and a higher percentage of high responders on the Barthel Index. Hemorrhagic patients showed a probability of a high therapeutic response on the Barthel Index that was ≈2.5 times greater than that of ischemic patients (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 5.20; accuracy on prediction, 87.06%). Conclusions— The results of this study provide further evidence of better functional prognosis in stroke survivors with hemorrhagic stroke.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, despite hemorrhagic stroke patients usually presenting with worse functional and clinical status compared to ischemic stroke, there are studies that support the same or even better functional prognosis in stroke survivors with hemorrhagic stroke, with age and initial stroke severity as the main prognostic factors [62, 63].”
From Early Occupational Therapy Intervention post-stroke (EOTIPS): A randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
(1965) · PubMed · Cited by 14,925
Functional evaluation : Barthel index
Mahonery, F. I. (1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,762
Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Warlow, C., & Burn, J. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o · Cited by 3,294
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics.
Foulkes, M. A., Wolf, P. A., Price, T. R., Mohr, J. P., & Hier, D. B. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.547 · Cited by 944
The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment
Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1991) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/03790799109166684 · Cited by 779
The Canadian Neurological Scale
Côté, R., Battista, R. N., Wolfson, C. M., Boucher, J., Adam, J., & Hachinski, V. (1989) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.39.5.638 · Cited by 459
Katz, N., Maeir, A., Ring, H., & Soroker, N. (1999) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90273-3 · Cited by 446
Sinyor, D., Amato, P., Kaloupek, D. G., Becker, R., Goldenberg, M., & Coopersmith, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.6.1102 · Cited by 373
The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
Nakayama, H., Jørgensen, H. S., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1994) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.25.4.808 · Cited by 366
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1161/str.20.6.2728043 · DOI
- 10.1161/str.21.2.2305399 · DOI
- 10.1161/str.25.2.8303743 · DOI
- 10.1161/str.25.4.8160225 · DOI
- 10.1161/str.33.1.179 · DOI
- Rossi PW, Forer S, Wiechers D. Effective rehabilitation for patients with stroke: analysis of entry, functional gain, and discharge to community. J Neurol Rehabil. 1997; 11: 27–33.
- 10.1161/str.19.5.3363586 · DOI
- Basso A. Approaches to neuropsychological rehabilitation: language disorders. In: Meter MJ Benson AL Dialer L eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1989: 294–314.
- 10.1161/str.17.6.3810708 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steiner, T., Kaste, M., Katse, M., Forsting, M., Mendelow, D. A., Kwieciński, H., Szikora, I., Juvela, S., Marchel, A., Chapot, R., et al. (2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 406
Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: Implications on neurotherapy after brain injury
Alawieh, A. M., Zhao, J., & Feng, W. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.08.029 · Cited by 242
Long-Term Survival and Function After Stroke
Sennfält, S., Norrving, B. G., Petersson, J., & Ullberg, T. (2018) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.118.022913 · Cited by 218
Hypertensive Disorders and Pregnancy-Related Stroke
Leffert, L. R., Clancy, C. R., Bateman, B. T., Bryant, A., & Kuklina, E. V. (2014) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000590 · Cited by 179
Guyomard, V., Fulcher, R., Redmayne, O., Metcalf, A. K., Potter, J. F., & Myint, P. K. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02526.x · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Grasso, M. G., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., De Angelis, D., Fusco, F. R., Morelli, D., Venturiero, V., Troisi, E., & Pratesi, L.
- Affiliations
- Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
- From Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia (S.P., G.A., M.G.G., M.B., P.C., D. De A., F.R.F., D.M., V.V., E.T., L.P.), and Department of Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza” (G.A.), Rome, Italy.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2861-2865
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2104104806
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke rehabilitation, functional outcome, stroke etiology, inpatient rehabilitation, Barthel Index, Canadian Neurological Scale, Rivermead Mobility Index, treatment response, length of hospital stay, rehabilitation dropout
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Brain Ischemia, Female, Humans, Italy, Length of Stay, Male, Neurologic Examination, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Prognosis, Rehabilitation Centers, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Recovery of Function, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
