The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flow Territory Mapping of the Cerebral Arteries With Regional Perfusion MRI
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Conventional contrast-enhanced angiography is the gold standard for visualization of the vascular tree supplied by the major cerebral arteries and assessment of collateral flow. Thus far, however, no methods are available to assess the actual flow territories of the individual cerebral arteries. In the present study, we evaluate a noninvasive arterial spin labeling MRI method for selective mapping of the flow territories of the left and right internal carotid arteries and posterior circulation (basilar artery and vertebral arteries). Methods— A spatially selective labeling approach, regional perfusion imaging, was developed on the basis of selective slab inversion of the arterial water with a pulsed arterial spin labeling sequence. The selectivity of this method was demonstrated. Results— Regional perfusion imaging enables assessment of the perfusion territories of the major cerebral arteries. With selective labeling of an internal carotid artery, signal is present in both the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery and ipsilateral middle cerebral artery flow territory. With labeling of the basilar artery, perfusion-weighted signal is symmetrically present in both posterior cerebral artery flow territories. Cerebral blood flow values measured with regional perfusion imaging in the complete hemisphere (40.1 mL · min −1 · 100 g −1 tissue), white matter (22.1 mL · min −1 · 100 g −1 tissue), and gray matter (65.8 mL · min −1 · 100 g −1 tissue) are in agreement with data in the literature. Conclusions— We present the first imaging method capable of evaluating both quantitatively and qualitatively the flow territories of the individual brain-feeding arteries in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodology of brain perfusion imaging
Barbier, E. L., Lamalle, L., & Décorps, M. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1073 · Cited by 404
Cited by
Model‐free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI
Petersen, E. T., Lim, T., & Golay, X. (2006) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20784 · Cited by 305
Self-citationA neuroradiologist’s guide to arterial spin labeling MRI in clinical practice
Grade, M., Hernandez Tamames, J. A., Pizzini, F. B., Achten, E., Golay, X., & Smits, M. (2015) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1571-z · Cited by 298
Self-citationPerfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comprehensive Update on Principles and Techniques
Jahng, G.-H., Li, K.-L., Ostergaard, L., & Calamante, F. (2014) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.554 · Cited by 256
Brain imaging in stroke: insight beyond diagnosis.
Nour, M., & Liebeskind, D. S. (2011) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-011-0046-0 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrikse, J., van der Grond, J., Lu, H., van Zijl, P. C. M., & Golay, X.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 882-887
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1965500305
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow Territory Mapping of the Cerebral Arteries With Regional Perfusion MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000120312.26163.ec
- The paper
- Hendrikse, J., van der Grond, J., Lu, H., van Zijl, P. C. M., & Golay, X. (2004). Flow Territory Mapping of the Cerebral Arteries With Regional Perfusion MRI. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000120312.26163.ec
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.