The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time Is Brain—Quantified
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The phrase “time is brain” emphasizes that human nervous tissue is rapidly lost as stroke progresses and emergent evaluation and therapy are required. Recent advances in quantitative neurostereology and stroke neuroimaging permit calculation of just how much brain is lost per unit time in acute ischemic stroke. Methods— Systematic literature-review identified consensus estimates of number of neurons, synapses, and myelinated fibers in the human forebrain; volume of large vessel, supratentorial ischemic stroke; and interval from onset to completion of large vessel, supratentorial ischemic stroke. Results— The typical final volume of large vessel, supratentorial ischemic stroke is 54 mL (varied in sensitivity analysis from 19 to 100 mL). The average duration of nonlacunar stroke evolution is 10 hours (range 6 to 18 hours), and the average number of neurons in the human forebrain is 22 billion. In patients experiencing a typical large vessel acute ischemic stroke, 120 million neurons, 830 billion synapses, and 714 km (447 miles) of myelinated fibers are lost each hour. In each minute, 1.9 million neurons, 14 billion synapses, and 12 km (7.5 miles) of myelinated fibers are destroyed. Compared with the normal rate of neuron loss in brain aging, the ischemic brain ages 3.6 years each hour without treatment. Altering single input variables in sensitivity analyses modestly affected the estimated point values but not order of magnitude. Conclusions— Quantitative estimates of the pace of neural circuitry loss in human ischemic stroke emphasize the time urgency of stroke care. The typical patient loses 1.9 million neurons each minute in which stroke is untreated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus
West, M. J., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902960102 · Cited by 1,153
Pakkenberg, B. (2003) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00151-1 · Cited by 485
Cited by
13 reasons why the brain is susceptible to oxidative stress
Cobley, J. N., Fiorello, M. L., & Bailey, D. M. (2018) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2018.01.008 · Cited by 1,215
Nanotechnological advances for the delivery of cns therapeutics.
Wong, H. L., Wu, X. Y., & Bendayan, R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.10.007 · Cited by 488
Adibhatla, R. M., & Hatcher, J. F. (2010) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2009.2668 · Cited by 480
Automated deep-neural-network surveillance of cranial images for acute neurologic events
Titano, J. J., Badgeley, M., Schefflein, J., Pain, M., Su, A., Cai, M., Swinburne, N., Zech, J., Kim, J., Bederson, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0147-y · Cited by 458
Acute ischemic stroke therapy overview
Catanese, L., Tarsia, J., & Fisher, M. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.116.309278 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Saver, J. L.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-266
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2121300729
- Cited by
- 2,181
- References
- 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Is Brain—Quantified. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000196957.55928.ab
- The paper
- Saver, J. L. (2006). Time Is Brain—Quantified. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000196957.55928.ab
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.