The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Clinical Outcome
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Medical treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenosis carries a high risk of stroke. This study was done to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes after intracranial angioplasty for this disease. Methods— A total of 120 patients with 124 intracranial stenoses were treated by primary angioplasty. All patients had neurologic symptoms (stroke or transient ischemic attack) attributable to intracranial stenoses ≥50%. Angiograms were evaluated before and after angioplasty for the degree of stenosis. Results— Pretreatment stenoses varied from 50% to 95% (mean 82.2±10.2). Post-treatment stenoses varied from 0% to 90% (mean 36.0±20.1). There were 3 strokes and 4 deaths (all neurological) within 30 days of the procedure, giving a combined periprocedural stroke and death rate of 5.8%. A total of 116 patients (96.7%) were available for a mean follow-up time of 42.3 months. There were 6 patients who had a stroke in the territory of treatment and 5 additional patients with stroke in other territories. Ten deaths occurred during the follow-up period, none of which were neurological. Including the periprocedural stroke and deaths, this yielded an annual stroke rate of 3.2% in the territory of treatment and a 4.4% annual rate for all strokes. Conclusion— Intracranial angioplasty can be performed with a high degree of technical success and a low risk of complications. Long-term clinical follow-up of intracranial angioplasty patients demonstrates a risk of future strokes that compares favorably to patients receiving medical therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170
Fiorella, D., Levy, E. I., Turk, A. S., Albuquerque, F. C., Niemann, D. B., Aagaard-Kienitz, B., Hanel, R. A., Woo, H., Rasmussen, P. A., Hopkins, L. N., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000257963.65728.e8 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, M. P., Wojak, J. C., Al-Ali, F., Jayaraman, M., Marcellus, M. L., Connors, J. J., & Do, H. M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1016-1020
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1967222605
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Clinical Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000206142.03677.c2
- The paper
- Marks, M. P., Wojak, J. C., Al-Ali, F., Jayaraman, M., Marcellus, M. L., Connors, J. J., & Do, H. M. (2006). Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Clinical Outcome. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000206142.03677.c2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.