The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease: Periprocedural Results
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— The current report details our initial periprocedural experience with Wingspan (Boston Scientific/Target), the first self-expanding stent system designed for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease. Methods— All patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting with the Gateway balloon–Wingspan stent system were prospectively tracked. Results— During a 9-month period, treatment with the stent system was attempted in 78 patients (average age, 63.6 years; 33 women) with 82 intracranial atheromatous lesions, of which 54 were ≥70% stenotic. Eighty-one of 82 lesions were successfully stented (98.8%) during the first treatment session. In 1 case, the stent could not be delivered across the lesion; the patient was treated solely with angioplasty and stented at a later date. Lesions treated involved the internal carotid (n=32; 8 petrous, 10 cavernous, 11 supraclinoid segment, 3 terminus), vertebral (n=14; V4 segment), basilar (n=14), and middle cerebral (n=22) arteries. Mean±SD pretreatment stenosis was 74.6±13.9%, improving to 43.5±18.1% after balloon angioplasty and to 27.2±16.7% after stent placement. Of the 82 lesions treated, there were 5 (6.1%) major periprocedural neurological complications, 4 of which ultimately led to patient death within 30 days of the procedure. Conclusions— Angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial atheromatous disease can be performed with the Gateway balloon–Wingspan stent system with a high rate of technical success and acceptable periprocedural morbidity. Our initial experience indicates that this procedure represents a viable treatment option for this patient population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
Chimowitz, M. I., Lynn, M. J., Howlett-Smith, H., Stern, B. J., Hertzberg, V. S., Frankel, M. R., Levine, S. R., Chaturvedi, S., Kasner, S. E., Benesch, C. G., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043033 · Cited by 1,744
The EC/IC Bypass Study Group* (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198511073131904 · Cited by 1,563
Predictors of Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of a Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
Kasner, S. E., Chimowitz, M. I., Lynn, M. J., Howlett-Smith, H., Stern, B. J., Hertzberg, V. S., Frankel, M. R., Levine, S. R., Chaturvedi, S., Benesch, C. G., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.578229 · Cited by 759
Connors, J. J., & Wojak, J. C. (1999) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0415 · Cited by 281
Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty.
Mori, T., Fukuoka, M., Kazita, K., et al. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 233
Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Clinical Outcome
Marks, M. P., Wojak, J. C., Al-Ali, F., Jayaraman, M., Marcellus, M. L., Connors, J. J., & Do, H. M. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000206142.03677.c2 · Cited by 224
Stenting of Symptomatic M1 Stenosis of Middle Cerebral Artery
Jiang, W., Wang, Y., Du, B., Wang, S.-X., Wang, G., Jin, M., & Jian-ping, D. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000128018.57526.3a · Cited by 157
Angioplasty for Intracranial Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Ischemia
Gress, D. R., Smith, W. S., Dowd, C. F., Halbach, V. V., Finley, R. J., & Higashida, R. T. (2002) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200207000-00004 · Cited by 94
Kim, J. K. (2004) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.019570 · Cited by 82
Chow, M., Masaryk, T. J., Woo, H. H., Mayberg, M. R., & Rasmussen, P. A. (2005) · PubMed Central · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Cited by
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiorella, D., Levy, E. I., Turk, A. S., Albuquerque, F. C., Niemann, D. B., Aagaard-Kienitz, B., Hanel, R. A., Woo, H., Rasmussen, P. A., Hopkins, L. N., Masaryk, T. J., & McDougall, C. G.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 881-887
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2005055910
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease: Periprocedural Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000257963.65728.e8
- The paper
- Fiorella, D., Levy, E. I., Turk, A. S., Albuquerque, F. C., Niemann, D. B., Aagaard-Kienitz, B., Hanel, R. A., Woo, H., Rasmussen, P. A., Hopkins, L. N., Masaryk, T. J., & McDougall, C. G. (2007). US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease: Periprocedural Results. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000257963.65728.e8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.