Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Features and Outcome in North American Adults With Moyamoya Phenomenon

Open access
Hallemeier, Christopher L., Rich, Keith M., Grubb, Robert L., Chicoine, Michael R., Moran, Christopher J., Cross, DeWitte T., Zipfel, Gregory J., Dacey, Ralph G., Derdeyn, Colin P.·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— To describe baseline clinical features and outcomes of adults with moyamoya phenomenon treated at a single North American institution. Methods— We identified 34 adults with moyamoya phenomenon by review of angiographic records. Clinical presentation and baseline stroke risk factors were obtained by chart review. Follow-up was obtained prospectively. A 5-year Kaplan-Meier stroke risk was calculated. Results— The median age was 42 (range 20 to 79) years. Twenty-five were women. The initial symptom was ischemia, hemorrhage, or asymptomatic in 24, 7, and 3 patients, respectively. Twenty-two had bilateral involvement and 12 had unilateral moyamoya vessels. Baseline stroke risk factors were similar between groups. The median follow-up in 31 living patients was 5.1 (range 0.2 to 19.6) years. Fourteen patients were treated with surgical revascularization (20 total hemispheres). In medically treated symptomatic hemispheres, the 5-year risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke was 65% after the initial symptom and 27% after angiographic diagnosis. Patients with bilateral involvement presenting with ischemic symptoms were at the highest risk of subsequent stroke (n=17, 5-year risk of stroke with medical treatment after first symptom of 82%). In surgically treated hemispheres, the 5-year risk of perioperative or subsequent ipsilateral stroke or death was 17%. This was significantly different compared with medical treatment after first symptom ( P =0.02) but not after angiographic diagnosis. Conclusion— Moyamoya phenomenon in North American adults is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke, particularly those with bilateral involvement and ischemic symptoms. These data suggest a potential benefit with surgery if diagnosis could be made earlier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000221787.70503.ca

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Hallemeier, C. L., Rich, K. M., Grubb, R. L., Chicoine, M. R., Moran, C. J., Cross, D. T., Zipfel, G. J., Dacey, R. G., & Derdeyn, C. P.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-06
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1490-1496
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2025076712
Cited by
337
References
17
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Features and Outcome in North American Adults With Moyamoya Phenomenon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000221787.70503.ca
The paper
Hallemeier, C. L., Rich, K. M., Grubb, R. L., Chicoine, M. R., Moran, C. J., Cross, D. T., Zipfel, G. J., Dacey, R. G., & Derdeyn, C. P. (2006). Clinical Features and Outcome in North American Adults With Moyamoya Phenomenon. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000221787.70503.ca

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.