The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: Methods of measurement and association with stroke risk
Abstract
Stenosis or occlusion of the major arteries of the head and neck may cause hemodynamic impairment of the distal cerebral circulation. Hemodynamic factors may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke for patients with cerebrovascular disease. Several neuroimaging methods are currently available for the indirect assessment of the hemodynamic effect of atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion on the distal cerebrovasculature. Because these methods rely on different underlying physiologic mechanisms, they are not interchangeable. Two basic categories of hemodynamic impairment can be assessed with these techniques: Stage 1, in which autoregulatory vasodilation secondary to reduced perfusion pressure is inferred by the measurement of either increased blood volume or an impaired blood flow response to a vasodilatory stimulus; and Stage 2, in which increased oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) is noninvasively but directly measured. The correlation of different Stage 1 methods with each other and with Stage 2 techniques is quite variable. Clinical studies associating different manifestations of hemodynamic impairment with stroke risk often suffer from methodologic problems. The best evidence to date for such an association is for increased OEF measured in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusion. In the absence of data demonstrating improvement in patient outcome, there is currently no role for the routine use of these tools to guide clinical management in patients with cerebrovascular disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Cited by
Silvestrini, M. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.16.2122 · Cited by 587
Derdeyn, C. P., Videen, T. O., Yundt, K. D., Fritsch, S. M., Carpenter, D. A., Grubb, R. L., & Powers, W. J. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf047 · Cited by 490
Self-citationHe, X., & Yablonskiy, D. A. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21108 · Cited by 396
Clinical Features and Outcome in North American Adults With Moyamoya Phenomenon
Hallemeier, C. L., Rich, K. M., Grubb, R. L., Chicoine, M. R., Moran, C. J., Cross, D. T., Zipfel, G. J., Dacey, R. G., & Derdeyn, C. P. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000221787.70503.ca · Cited by 337
Self-citationNon-invasive imaging of oxygen extraction fraction in adults with sickle cell anaemia
Jordan, L. C., Gindville, M. C., Scott, A. O., Juttukonda, M. R., Strother, M. K., Kassim, A. A., Chen, S.-C., Lu, H., Pruthi, S., Shyr, Y., et al. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv397 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Derdeyn, C. P., Grubb, R. L., & Powers, W. J.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-251
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2068691217
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: Methods of measurement and association with stroke risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.2.251
- The paper
- Derdeyn, C. P., Grubb, R. L., & Powers, W. J. (1999). Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: Methods of measurement and association with stroke risk. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.2.251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.