The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Few data exist about clinical, radiologic findings, clinical outcome, and its predictors in patients with spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (sVAD). Methods— Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, 3-month outcomes, and its predictors were investigated in consecutive patients with sVAD. Results— One hundred sixty-nine patients with 195 sVAD were identified. Brain ischemia occurred in 131 patients (77%; ischemic stroke, n=114, 67%; transient ischemic attack, n=17, 10%). Three patients with ischemic stroke showed also signs of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); 3 (2%) had SAH without ischemia. The 134 patients with brain ischemia or SAH had head and/or neck pain in 118 (88%) and pulsatile tinnitus in seven (5%) patients. The remaining 35 patients (21%) had isolated head and/or neck pain in 21 (12%) cases, asymptomatic sVAD in 13 (8%), and cervical radiculopathy in one case (1%). Location of sVAD was more often in the pars transversaria (V2; 35%) or atlas loop (V3; 34%) than in the prevertebral (V1; 20%) or intracranial (V4; 11%) segment ( P =0.0001). Outcome was favorable (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) in 88 (82%) of 107 ischemic stroke patients with follow up. Two (2%) patients died. Low baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ( P <0.0001) and younger age ( P =0.007) were independent predictors of favorable outcome. Conclusions— sVAD is predominantly located in the pars transversaria (V2) or the atlas loop (V3). Most patients show posterior circulation ischemia. Favorable outcome is observed in most ischemic strokes and independently predicted by low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and younger age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
(1999) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-199917020-00001 · Cited by 3,695
Spontaneous Dissection of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries
Schievink, W. I. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103223441206 · Cited by 1,575
Headache and neck pain in spontaneous internal carotid and vertebral artery dissections
Silbert, P. L., Mokri, B., & Schievink, W. I. (1995) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.45.8.1517 · Cited by 481
Dissections of Cervical and Cerebral Arteries
Hart, R. G., & Easton, J. D. (1983) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8619(18)31177-0 · Cited by 443
Report of four cases and review of the literature
Axton, A. W. L., & Perrin, R. G. (2006) · Cited by 430
Cervical artery dissection?clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients
Dziewas, R., Konrad, C., Dr�ger, B., Evers, S., Besselmann, M., L�demann, P., Kuhlenb�umer, G., St�gbauer, F., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2003) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-003-0174-5 · Cited by 391
Spontaneous dissections of the vertebral arteries
Mokri, B., Houser, O. W., Sandok, B. A., & Piepgras, D. G. (1988) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.38.6.880 · Cited by 351
Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection: A multicenter study
Touzé, E., Gauvrit, J.-Y., Moulin, T., Meder, J.-F., Bracard, S., & Mas, J.-L. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000094325.95097.86 · Cited by 304
Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection: Early diagnosis and management in 44 patients
Sturzenegger, M. (1995) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf00919596 · Cited by 246
Self-citation
Cited by
Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome
Debette, S., & Leys, D. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70084-5 · Cited by 833
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection
Debette, S., Compter, A., Labeyrie, M.-A., Uyttenboogaart, M., Metso, T. M., Majersik, J. J., Goeggel-Simonetti, B., Engelter, S. T., Pezzini, A., Bijlenga, P., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00009-5 · Cited by 466
Self-citationDiagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction
Edlow, J. A., Newman-Toker, D. E., & Savitz, S. I. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70216-3 · Cited by 329
Cassidy, J. D., Boyle, E., Côté, P., He, Y., Hogg-Johnson, S., Silver, F. L., & Bondy, S. J. (2008) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181644600 · Cited by 287
Rushton, A., Rivett, D., Carlesso, L., Flynn, T., Hing, W., & Kerry, R. (2014) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2013.11.005 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, M., Bousser, M. G., Fahrni, G., Fischer, U., Georgiadis, D., Gandjour, J., Benninger, D., Sturzenegger, M., Mattle, H. P., & Baumgartner, R. W.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2499-2503
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2013781278
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000240493.88473.39
- The paper
- Arnold, M., Bousser, M. G., Fahrni, G., Fischer, U., Georgiadis, D., Gandjour, J., Benninger, D., Sturzenegger, M., Mattle, H. P., & Baumgartner, R. W. (2006). Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000240493.88473.39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.