Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome

Open access
Arnold, Marcel, Bousser, Marie Germaine, Fahrni, Gregor, Fischer, Urs, Georgiadis, Dimitrios, Gandjour, Joubin, Benninger, David, Sturzenegger, Matthias, Mattle, Heinrich P., Baumgartner, Ralf W.·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Few data exist about clinical, radiologic findings, clinical outcome, and its predictors in patients with spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (sVAD). Methods— Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, 3-month outcomes, and its predictors were investigated in consecutive patients with sVAD. Results— One hundred sixty-nine patients with 195 sVAD were identified. Brain ischemia occurred in 131 patients (77%; ischemic stroke, n=114, 67%; transient ischemic attack, n=17, 10%). Three patients with ischemic stroke showed also signs of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); 3 (2%) had SAH without ischemia. The 134 patients with brain ischemia or SAH had head and/or neck pain in 118 (88%) and pulsatile tinnitus in seven (5%) patients. The remaining 35 patients (21%) had isolated head and/or neck pain in 21 (12%) cases, asymptomatic sVAD in 13 (8%), and cervical radiculopathy in one case (1%). Location of sVAD was more often in the pars transversaria (V2; 35%) or atlas loop (V3; 34%) than in the prevertebral (V1; 20%) or intracranial (V4; 11%) segment ( P =0.0001). Outcome was favorable (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) in 88 (82%) of 107 ischemic stroke patients with follow up. Two (2%) patients died. Low baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ( P <0.0001) and younger age ( P =0.007) were independent predictors of favorable outcome. Conclusions— sVAD is predominantly located in the pars transversaria (V2) or the atlas loop (V3). Most patients show posterior circulation ischemia. Favorable outcome is observed in most ischemic strokes and independently predicted by low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and younger age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000240493.88473.39

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, M., Bousser, M. G., Fahrni, G., Fischer, U., Georgiadis, D., Gandjour, J., Benninger, D., Sturzenegger, M., Mattle, H. P., & Baumgartner, R. W.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-10
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
2499-2503
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2013781278
Cited by
421
References
12
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000240493.88473.39
The paper
Arnold, M., Bousser, M. G., Fahrni, G., Fischer, U., Georgiadis, D., Gandjour, J., Benninger, D., Sturzenegger, M., Mattle, H. P., & Baumgartner, R. W. (2006). Vertebral Artery Dissection: Presenting Findings and Predictors of Outcome. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000240493.88473.39

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.