Cited by 152Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction prior to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy intervention

Rushton, A., Rivett, D., Carlesso, L., Flynn, T., Hing, W., Kerry, R.·2014·Manual Therapy

Abstract

A consensus clinical reasoning framework for best practice for the examination of the cervical spine region has been developed through an iterative consultative process with experts and manual physical therapy organisations. The framework was approved by the 22 member countries of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (October 2012). The purpose of the framework is to provide guidance to clinicians for the assessment of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction in advance of planned management (inclusive of manual therapy and exercise interventions). The best, most recent scientific evidence is combined with international expert opinion, and is presented with the intention to be informative, but not prescriptive; and therefore as an aid to the clinician's clinical reasoning. Important underlying principles of the framework are that 1] although presentations and adverse events of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction are rare, it is a potentially serious condition and needs to be considered in musculoskeletal assessment; 2] manual therapists cannot rely on the results of one clinical test to draw conclusions as to the presence or risk of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction; and 3] a clinically reasoned understanding of the patient's presentation, including a risk:benefit analysis, following an informed, planned and individualised assessment, is essential for recognition of this condition and for safe manual therapy practice in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.math.2013.11.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rushton, A., Rivett, D., Carlesso, L., Flynn, T., Hing, W., & Kerry, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (US)
  • Bond University (AU)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Rushton, A.
Venue
Manual Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
222-228
ISSN
1356-689X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053054355
Cited by
152
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Manual Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-publications@bond (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Keywords
cervical spine examination, informed consent, risk-benefit assessment, musculoskeletal assessment, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Carotid Artery Diseases, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Medical History Taking, Physical Examination, Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Neck Pain, Manipulation, Spinal, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Consensus, Internationality, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review