International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction prior to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy intervention
Abstract
A consensus clinical reasoning framework for best practice for the examination of the cervical spine region has been developed through an iterative consultative process with experts and manual physical therapy organisations. The framework was approved by the 22 member countries of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (October 2012). The purpose of the framework is to provide guidance to clinicians for the assessment of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction in advance of planned management (inclusive of manual therapy and exercise interventions). The best, most recent scientific evidence is combined with international expert opinion, and is presented with the intention to be informative, but not prescriptive; and therefore as an aid to the clinician's clinical reasoning. Important underlying principles of the framework are that 1] although presentations and adverse events of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction are rare, it is a potentially serious condition and needs to be considered in musculoskeletal assessment; 2] manual therapists cannot rely on the results of one clinical test to draw conclusions as to the presence or risk of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction; and 3] a clinically reasoned understanding of the patient's presentation, including a risk:benefit analysis, following an informed, planned and individualised assessment, is essential for recognition of this condition and for safe manual therapy practice in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Provider preference and expectations of manual therapy may influence patient-reported outcomes.
“provider preference, and expectations of MT may influence patient-reported outcomes.60”
Cites
Savitz, S. I., & Caplan, L. R. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041544 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wiangkham, T., Duda, J., Haque, M. S., Price, J., & Rushton, A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215803 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationLam, A. C., Liddle, L. J., & MacLellan, C. L. (2023) · Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation · doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100242 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Proper screening for risk factors can ensure patient safety and minimize the likelihood of adverse events.(59)”
Background
- Authors
- Rushton, A., Rivett, D., Carlesso, L., Flynn, T., Hing, W., & Kerry, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- University Health Network (CA)
- Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (US)
- Bond University (AU)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rushton, A.
- Venue
- Manual Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 222-228
- ISSN
- 1356-689X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053054355
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Manual Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- e-publications@bond (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
- Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
- Keywords
- cervical spine examination, informed consent, risk-benefit assessment, musculoskeletal assessment, exercise intervention
- MeSH terms
- Carotid Artery Diseases, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Medical History Taking, Physical Examination, Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Neck Pain, Manipulation, Spinal, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Consensus, Internationality, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review