Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

"AICLA" controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia.

Open access
Bousser, M G, Eschwege, E, Haguenau, M, Lefaucconnier, J M, Thibult, N, Touboul, D, Touboul, P J·1983·Stroke

Abstract

604 Patients with atherothrombotic cerebral ischemic events (transient, 16%: or completed, 84%) referrable either to the carotid or to the vertebral-basilar circulation were entered into a double blind randomized clinical trial (AICLA) to determine whether aspirin (A) (1 g/day) or aspirin (1 g/day) + Dipyridamole (225 mg/day) (AD) would produce a significant reduction in the subsequent (3 years) occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cerebral infarction. Randomization produced remarkably comparable treatment groups and this good comparability was maintained throughout the study. Adherence to the protocol and drug compliance were excellent. Side effects, particularly symptoms of peptic ulcer and hemorrhagic events were significantly (p less than 0.03) more frequent in the two treatment groups containing aspirin. With the exception of patients who withdrew from the study, each patient was followed for 3 years. At the end of the study, the number of fatal and nonfatal cerebral infarctions was 31 in the placebo (P) group, 17 in the A group and 18 in the AD group. Taking into account the duration of follow-up for each patient, these figures correspond to cumulative rates of 18% in the P group and 10.5% in each of the 2 active treatment groups. Analysis with the Mantel Method showed: 1)--A difference at the 6% level between the 3 groups and between P and AD; 2)--A difference at the 5% level between P and A; 3)--No difference between (A and AD; 4)--A difference at the 2% level between the P group and the two treated groups taken together (A + AD). Among other diseases occurring during the trial, the only significant difference concerned myocardial infarction, which was less frequent in the 2 treated groups (P less than 0.05). Subgroup analysis failed to show a significant sex difference in the efficacy of aspirin. It is concluded that, in patients comparable to those defined in the protocol, Aspirin (1 g) has a significantly beneficial effect in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic cerebral infarction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.14.1.5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Bousser, M. G., Eschwege, E., Haguenau, M., Lefaucconnier, J. M., Thibult, N., Touboul, D., & Touboul, P. J.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1983-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
5-14
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2102500579
Cited by
612
References
0
FWCI
25.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "AICLA" controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.14.1.5
The paper
Bousser, M. G., Eschwege, E., Haguenau, M., Lefaucconnier, J. M., Thibult, N., Touboul, D., & Touboul, P. J. (1983). "AICLA" controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.14.1.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.