Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 964

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Mayberg, Marc R.·1991·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether carotid endarterectomy provides protection against subsequent cerebral ischemia in men with ischemic symptoms in the distribution of significant (greater than 50%) ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Sixteen university-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: Men who presented within 120 days of onset of symptoms that were consistent with transient ischemic attacks, transient monocular blindness, or recent small completed strokes between July 1988 and February 1991. Among 5000 patients screened, 189 individuals were randomized with angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 50% ipsilateral to the presenting symptoms. Forty-eight eligible patients who refused entry were followed up outside of the trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cerebral infarction or crescendo transient ischemic attacks in the vascular distribution of the original symptoms or death within 30 days of randomization. INTERVENTION: Carotid endarterectomy plus the best medical care (n = 91) vs the best medical care alone (n = 98). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, there was a significant reduction in stroke or crescendo transient ischemic attacks in patients who received carotid endarterectomy (7.7%) compared with nonsurgical patients (19.4%), or an absolute risk reduction of 11.7% (P = .011). The benefit of surgery was more profound in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% (absolute risk reduction, 17.7%; P = .004). The benefit of surgery was apparent within 2 months after randomization, and only one stroke was noted in the surgical group beyond the 30-day perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: For a selected cohort of men with symptoms of cerebral or retinal ischemia in the distribution of a high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis, carotid endarterectomy can effectively reduce the risk of subsequent ipsilateral cerebral ischemia. The risk of cerebral ischemia in this subgroup of patients is considerably higher than previously estimated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 964

Metadata

Authors
Mayberg, M. R.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1991-12-18
Volume
266
Issue
23
Pages
3289
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2107437919
Cited by
964
References
17
FWCI
26.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029
The paper
Mayberg, M. R. (1991). Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.