The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress review: hypoglycemic brain damage.
Open accessAbstract
The central question to be addressed in this review can be stated as "How does hypoglycemia kill neurons?" Initial research on hypoglycemic brain damage in the 1930s was aimed at demonstrating the existence of any brain damage whatsoever due to insulin. Recent results indicate that uncomplicated hypoglycemia is capable of killing neurons in the brain. However, the mechanism does not appear to be simply glucose starvation of the neuron resulting in neuronal breakdown. Rather than such an "internal catabolic death" current evidence suggests that in hypoglycemia, neurons are killed from without, i.e. from the extracellular space. Around the time the EEG becomes isoelectric, an endogenous neurotoxin is produced, and is released by the brain into tissue and cerebrospinal fluid. The distribution of necrotic neurons is unlike that in ischemia, being related to white matter and cerebrospinal fluid pathways. The toxin acts by first disrupting dendritic trees, sparing intermediate axons, indicating it to be an excitotoxin. Exact mechanisms of excitotoxic neuronal necrosis are not yet clear, but neuronal death involves hyperexcitation, and culminates in cell membrane rupture. Endogenous excitotoxins produced during hypoglycemia may explain the tendency toward seizure activity often seen clinically. The recent research results on which these findings are based are reviewed, and clinical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efflux of radiolabeled polyethylene glycols and albumin from rat brain
Cserr, H. F., Cooper, D. N., Suri, P. K., & Patlak, C. S. (1981) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.1981.240.4.f319 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Historical Overview: Calcium, Ischemia, and Death of Brain Cellsa
SIESJÖ, B. K. (1988) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb33410.x · Cited by 422
Suh, S. W., Gum, E. T., Hamby, A. M., Chan, P. H., & Swanson, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci30077 · Cited by 419
Cerebral function in diabetes mellitus
Biessels, G. J., Kappelle, A. C., Bravenboer, B., Erkelens, D. W., & Gispen, W. H. (1994) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00417687 · Cited by 334
Biological differences between ischemia, hypoglycemia, and epilepsy
Auer, R. N., & Siesjo, B. K. (1988) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410240602 · Cited by 331
Self-citationUnexplained Deaths of Type 1 Diabetic Patients
Tattersall, R. B., & Gill, G. V. (1991) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01516.x · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Auer, R. N.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 699-708
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2027171209
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress review: hypoglycemic brain damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.17.4.699
- The paper
- Auer, R. N. (1986). Progress review: hypoglycemic brain damage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.17.4.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.