The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study.
Abstract
Clinical events following cerebral angiography were prospectively evaluated in 1,002 procedures. The ischemic event rate between 0 and 24 hours was 1.3% (0.1% permanent). This incidence was higher (2.5%) in patients investigated for cerebrovascular disease, but the difference was not significant. In addition, 1.8% of the patients suffered ischemia (0.3% permanent) between 24 and 72 hours after angiography. Cerebral ischemic events occurred as a recurrence or worsening of a preexisting phenomenon. twice as often as de novo. All permanent ischemia was a worsening of a preexisting phenomenon. There was a significant increase in the incidence of neurologic events between 0 and 24 hours when the procedure lasted longer than 60 minutes and when there was systolic hypertension. Trends toward higher incidence were noted with the use of increased volume of contrast, with increased serum creatinine, when transient ischemic attacks or stroke were the indications, and when 3 or more catheters were used. The incidence of neurologic events between 24 and 72 hours increased significantly with the increase in the amount of contrast used, with age, and with diabetes. The occurrence of nonneurologic events (mostly hematomas) was significantly increased by multiple factors. This study shows that events can and do occur beyond the usual observation period of 24 hours but confirms the low risk of cerebral angiography when performed judiciously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Willinsky, R. A., Taylor, S. M., terBrugge, K., Farb, R. I., Tomlinson, G., & Montanera, W. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 · Cited by 895
Brott, T. G., Halperin, J. L., Abbara, S., Bacharach, J. M., Barr, J. D., Bush, R. L., Cates, C. U., Creager, M. A., Fowler, S. B., Friday, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006 · Cited by 447
Qureshi, A. I., Luft, A. R., Sharma, M., Guterman, L. R., & Hopkins, L. N. (2000) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200006000-00014 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Dion, J. E., Gates, P. C., Fox, A. J., Barnett, H. J., & Blom, R. J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 997-1004
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2012321895
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.18.6.997
- The paper
- Dion, J. E., Gates, P. C., Fox, A. J., Barnett, H. J., & Blom, R. J. (1987). Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.18.6.997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.