The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of normothermic versus mild hyperthermic forebrain ischemia in rats.
Open accessAbstract
We compared the neuropathological consequences of global forebrain ischemia under normothermia versus mild hyperthermia. Twenty-one rats underwent 20 minutes of four-vessel occlusion during which brain temperature was maintained at either 37 degrees C (normothermia, n = 9) or 39 degrees C (hyperthermia, n = 12). Quantitative neuropathological assessment was conducted 1 or 3 days later. At 1 day following the ischemic insult, normothermic rats demonstrated neuronal injury mainly confined to the most dorsolateral striatum. By 3 days, ischemic cells were present throughout the striatum and CA1 hippocampus in normothermic animals. Compared with normothermic rats, intraischemic hyperthermia significantly increased the extent and severity of brain damage at 1 day after the ischemic insult. Areas of severe neuronal necrosis and frank infarction included the cerebral cortex, CA1 hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus. Morphologic damage was also detected in the cerebellum and pars reticulata of the substantia nigra. An overall mortality rate of 83% was demonstrated at 3 days in the hyperthermic ischemic group. We conclude that intraischemic hyperthermia 1) markedly augments ischemic brain damage and mortality compared with normothermia, 2) transforms ischemic cell injury into frank infarction, and 3) accelerates the morphological appearance of ischemic brain injury in regions usually demonstrating delayed neuronal necrosis. These observations on mild hyperthermia may have important implications for patients undergoing cardiac or cerebrovascular surgery as well as patients following cardiac arrest or those with stroke-in-evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ng, T., Graham, D. I., Adams, J. H., & Ford, I. (1989) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00688181 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Combating Hyperthermia in Acute Stroke: A Significant Clinical Concern
Ginsberg, M. D., & Busto, R. (1998) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.29.2.529 · Cited by 485
Self-citationDietrich, W. D., Alonso, O., Busto, R., Globus, M. Y. T., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1994) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00296740 · Cited by 318
Self-citationPostischemic hypothermia: A critical appraisal with implications for clinical treatment
Colbourne, F., Sutherland, G., & Corbett, D. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740655 · Cited by 269
Chatzipanteli, K., Alonso, O. F., Kraydieh, S., & Dietrich, W. D. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00012 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietrich, W. D., Busto, R., Valdes, I., & Loor, Y.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1318-1325
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2001446879
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of normothermic versus mild hyperthermic forebrain ischemia in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.21.9.1318
- The paper
- Dietrich, W. D., Busto, R., Valdes, I., & Loor, Y. (1990). Effects of normothermic versus mild hyperthermic forebrain ischemia in rats. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.21.9.1318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.