The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and significance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery in acute stroke.
Open accessAbstract
Early noncontrast computed tomographic scans may visualize a hyperdense middle cerebral artery before the infarct becomes visible. This sign disappears within a few days, corresponds to the clot itself, and might be associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to determine its prevalence, diagnostic value, relationship to demographic data, ability to separate embolic from nonembolic causes, short-term prognostic value, evolution over time, and relationship to arterial occlusion on angiography. We performed this study using computed tomographic scans performed within 12 hours after onset in 272 consecutive unselected patients with a first acute cerebrovascular event. Seventy-three subjects had the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign, leading to a prevalence of 26.8% in the whole group and 41.2% in patients with a middle cerebral artery infarct. Specificity was 100%, but sensitivity was only 30%. This sign was not dependent on cerebrovascular risk factors, but was more likely to occur in cortical and in large, deep, middle cerebral artery infarcts (p less than 0.01). It provided only a 3.5% gain in predicting death, and one fifth of patients with the sign recovered within 2 weeks; this sign was not an independent variable of poor outcome on multiple linear regression. It spontaneously disappeared within a few days and was always related to an occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in patients who underwent early angiography. The hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign is useful in the diagnosis of middle cerebral artery occlusion but does not always predict a poor prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riedel, C. H., Zimmermann, P., Jensen-Kondering, U., Stingele, R., Deuschl, G., & Jansen, O. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.609693 · Cited by 572
Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap
Wintermark, M., Albers, G. W., Alexandrov, A. V., Alger, J. R., Bammer, R., Baron, J.-C., Davis, S., Demaerschalk, B. M., Derdeyn, C. P., Donnan, G. A., et al. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.512319 · Cited by 423
Merino, J. G., & Warach, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Leys, D., Pruvo, J. P., Godefroy, O., Rondepierre, P., & Leclerc, X.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-324
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2152846291
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and significance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery in acute stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.23.3.317
- The paper
- Leys, D., Pruvo, J. P., Godefroy, O., Rondepierre, P., & Leclerc, X. (1992). Prevalence and significance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery in acute stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.23.3.317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.