The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cerebellar infarction. Clinical and anatomic observations in 66 cases.
Abstract
Cerebellar infarction displays different clinical features, depending on the vascular territory involved. We studied patients with infarcts in the territories of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery or the superior cerebellar artery to compare their clinical presentation, course, and prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, laboratory data, and imaging studies of 66 patients with cerebellar infarction collected consecutively at five institutions. All the cerebellar infarcts were documented on computed tomographic scan or magnetic resonance imaging. Two distinct profiles emerged, depending on the vascular territory involved. In 36 patients with posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory infarcts, a triad of vertigo, headache, and gait imbalance predominated at stroke onset. Computed tomography showed severe cerebellar mass effect in 11 cases (30%), with associated hydrocephalus in seven. In these seven patients (19%), postinfarct swelling led to brain stem compression that resulted in four deaths. In 30 patients with superior cerebellar artery infarcts, gait disturbance predominated at onset; vertigo and headache were significantly less common. The clinical course was usually benign. Computed tomography showed marked cerebellar mass effect, hydrocephalus, and brain stem compression in only two instances (7%). Presumed cerebral embolism was the predominant stroke mechanism in patients with superior cerebellar artery distribution infarcts, whereas in those with posterior inferior cerebellar artery distribution infarcts, the stroke mechanism was equally divided between cardiogenic embolism and posterior circulation arterial disease. Cerebellar infarcts in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery and superior cerebellar artery distribution have distinct differences in clinical presentation, course, and prognosis. These differences should help in the selection of appropriate monitoring and treatment strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stoodley, C. J., & Schmahmann, J. D. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008 · Cited by 1,360
De Cocker, L. J. L., van Veluw, S. J., Fowkes, M., Luijten, P. R., Mali, W. P. T. M., & Hendrikse, J. (2013) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000353668 · Cited by 1,156
Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation
Martin, T. A., Keating, J. G., Goodkin, H. P., Bastian, A. J., & Thach, W. T. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.4.1183 · Cited by 625
Wijdicks, E. F. M., Sheth, K. N., Carter, B. S., Greer, D. M., Kasner, S. E., Kimberly, W. T., Schwab, S., Smith, E. E., Tamargo, R. J., & Wintermark, M. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6 · Cited by 522
Tarnutzer, A. A., Berkowitz, A. L., Robinson, K. A., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Newman-Toker, D. E. (2011) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.100174 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Kase, C. S., Norrving, B., Levine, S. R., Babikian, V. L., Chodosh, E. H., Wolf, P. A., & Welch, K. M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-83
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2099790143
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebellar infarction. Clinical and anatomic observations in 66 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.24.1.76
- The paper
- Kase, C. S., Norrving, B., Levine, S. R., Babikian, V. L., Chodosh, E. H., Wolf, P. A., & Welch, K. M. (1993). Cerebellar infarction. Clinical and anatomic observations in 66 cases. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.1.76
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.