The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence supporting a role for programmed cell death in focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
Abstract
Cells die by one of two mechanisms, necrosis or programmed cell death. Necrosis has been implicated in stroke and occurs when the cytoplasmic membrane is compromised. Programmed cell death requires protein synthesis and often involves endonucleolytic cleavage of the cellular DNA. We assessed the potential contribution of programmed cell death to ischemia-induced neuronal death. Cycloheximide (protein synthesis inhibitor; 1 mg/kg per 24 hours) or vehicle (1 mL/kg per 24 hours) was continuously infused into the right cerebral ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neocortical focal ischemia was produced by tandem occlusion of the right common carotid artery and the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. After 24 hours the brain was stained with 2% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium and the ischemic zone quantitated. Protein synthesis was determined by [3H]methionine incorporation into acid-precipitated protein. DNA integrity was determined in isolated DNA by gel electrophoresis and in whole cells by flow cytometry. Continuous cycloheximide infusion caused approximately 70% reduction in cortical protein synthesis. Cycloheximide also reduced the size of the infarction produced by focal cerebral ischemia when compared with controls (ischemic brain volume, 147.5 +/- 25.9 and 188.7 +/- 16.8 mm3 for cycloheximide and saline, respectively; P < .01), suggesting that protein synthesis may contribute to cell death. Purified DNA from the ischemic zone showed evidence of endonucleolytic degradation when fractionated by gel electrophoresis. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated increased propidium iodide fluorescence in intact cells isolated from ischemic cortex, indicating an increased accessibility of degraded DNA to the intercalating dye. New protein synthesis appears to contribute to ischemic cell death in which endonucleolytic DNA degradation is apparent. These observations implicate programmed cell death in ischemic injury and may open unique therapeutic approaches for the preservation of neurons in stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regressive Events in Neurogenesis
Cowan, W. M., Fawcett, J. W., O'Leary, D. D. M., & Stanfield, B. B. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6474175 · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Ankarcrona, M., Dypbukt, J. M., Bonfoco, E., Zhivotovsky, B., Orrenius, S., Lipton, S. A., & Nicotera, P. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90186-8 · Cited by 1,884
The changing landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms
Lee, J.-M., Zipfel, G. J., & Choi, D. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/399a007 · Cited by 1,102
Calpain and caspase: can you tell the difference?
Wang, K. K. W. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01479-4 · Cited by 912
Apoptosis and Caspases in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Friedlander, R. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022366 · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Linnik, M. D., Zobrist, R. H., & Hatfield, M. D.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2002-2008
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1975896299
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence supporting a role for programmed cell death in focal cerebral ischemia in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.24.12.2002
- The paper
- Linnik, M. D., Zobrist, R. H., & Hatfield, M. D. (1993). Evidence supporting a role for programmed cell death in focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.12.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.