The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project.
Open accessAbstract
There have been few community-based studies of long-term prognosis after acute stroke. This study aims to provide precise estimates of the absolute and relative risks of stroke recurrence in an unselected cohort of patients with a first-ever stroke. Six hundred seventy-five patients were registered in a community-based stroke register (the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project) and prospectively followed for up to 6.5 years. Their relative risk of recurrent stroke was calculated using age- and sex-specific incidence rates for first stroke in Oxfordshire. One hundred eighty recurrent episodes of stroke were identified, of which 135 were first recurrences. Given survival, the actuarial risk of suffering a recurrence was 30% (95% confidence interval, 20% to 39%) by 5 years, about nine times the risk of stroke in the general population. The risk was highest early after the first stroke: 13% (95% confidence interval, 10% to 16%) by 1 year, 15 times the risk in the general population. After the first year the average annual risk was about 4%. The risk of stroke recurrence did not appear to be related to age or pathological type of stroke. The absolute and relative risks of recurrent stroke are highest early after the first stroke but remain elevated for several years thereafter. Efforts at secondary prevention should be initiated as soon as possible and continued for several years to gain greatest benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: The fiamingham Study
Wolf, P. A., Dawber, T. R., Thomas, H. E., & Kannel, W. B. (1978) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.28.10.973 · Cited by 1,526
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
Billinger, S. A., Arena, R., Bernhardt, J., Eng, J. J., Franklin, B. A., Johnson, C. M., MacKay-Lyons, M., Macko, R. F., Mead, G. E., Roth, E. J., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000022 · Cited by 1,529
Risk and Cumulative Risk of Stroke Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mohan, K. M., Wolfe, C. D. A., Rudd, A. G., Heuschmann, P. U., Kolominsky-Rabas, P. L., & Grieve, A. P. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.602615 · Cited by 683
Metadata
- Authors
- Burn, J., Dennis, M., Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Wade, D., & Warlow, C.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-337
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1912243307
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.25.2.333
- The paper
- Burn, J., Dennis, M., Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Wade, D., & Warlow, C. (1994). Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.2.333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.