Cited by 1,526Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: The fiamingham Study

Open access
Wolf, Philip A., Dawber, Thomas R., Thomas, H. Emerson, Kannel, William B.·1978·Neurology

Abstract

Chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) as a precursor of stroke was assessed over 24 years of follow-up of the general population sample at Framingham, Massachusetts. Persons with chronic established AF, with or without rheumatic heart disease (RHD), are at greatly increased risk of stroke, and the stroke is probably due to embolism. Chronic AF in the absence of RHD is associated with more than a fivefold increase in stroke indicence, while AF with RHD has a 17-fold increase. Stroke occurrence increased as duration of AF increased, with no evidence of a particularly vulnerable period. Chronic idiopathic AF is an important precursor of cerebral embolism. Controlled trials of anticoagulants or antiarrhythmic agents in persons with chronic AF may demonstrate if strokes can be prevented in this highly susceptible group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.28.10.973

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benjamin et al. showed that the population attributable risk for developing atrial fibrillation was highest for hypertension, despite other risk factors having higher relative risks.

    “For instance, Benjamin and colleagues showed that the PAR for developing atrial fibrillation was highest for hypertension, despite the fact that other risk factors were associated with higher relative risks.80”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, P. A., Dawber, T. R., Thomas, H. E., & Kannel, W. B.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1978-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
973-973
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2161283927
Cited by
1,526
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 45
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
chronic atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, cerebral embolism, rheumatic heart disease, idiopathic atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation duration, stroke incidence, anticoagulation, antiarrhythmic drugs, Framingham Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Chronic Disease, Embolism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Rheumatic Heart Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review